search for: 61s

reassign 646917 xen thanks -- .''`. Sell Crazy Someplace Else. We're all stocked up here : :' : `. `' `- Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux

...ving a few problems and I''m at a loss what might cause it. A number of times in the past few days, our unicorn slaves keep timing out & the master keeps restarting them. unicorn.log looks something like : E, [2011-12-08T18:11:32.912237 #26661] ERROR -- : worker=5 PID:15367 timeout (61s > 60s), killing E, [2011-12-08T18:11:32.952041 #26661] ERROR -- : reaped #<Process::Status: pid 15367 SIGKILL (signal 9)> worker=5 I, [2011-12-08T18:11:32.985925 #17824] INFO -- : worker=5 ready E, [2011-12-08T18:11:42.962869 #26661] ERROR -- : worker=3 PID:15499 timeout (61s > 60s), k...

what does it mean? i never seen that before xen4 on debian squeeze 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 [22077.208077] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [udisks-dm-expor:11772] [22077.208139] Modules linked in: ext4 jbd2 crc16 xfs exportfs xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 xt_state nf_conntrack xt_physdev bridge stp ip6table_filter ip6_tables iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables xen_evtchn xenfs fuse loop snd_pcm snd_timer snd soundcore snd_...

...execve+0x2a/0x4a Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04047aa>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0610000>] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: ======================= Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [sshd:24188] Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Pid: 24188, comm: sshd Not tainted (2.6.25.3 #3) Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c06154f0>] EFLAGS: 00200293 CPU: 7 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x15 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2...

...server (debian lenny 2.6.29-xs5.5.0.17) with one ext3 partiton for the os and one xfs partition for the data. Two webserver are using this fileserver with nfs. Now i run the second time into following problem when rsync was running for backup: [212521.428003] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [rsync:29921] [212521.428003] Modules linked in: ipv6 nfsd nfs lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc xenfs xfs exportfs loop evdev xen_netfront pcspkr ext3 jbd mbcache xen_blkfront thermal_sys [212521.428003] [212521.428003] Pid: 29921, comm: rsync Tainted: G D (2.6.29-xs5.5.0.17 #1) [212521.42...

Ian, I came across the subject line on a 96GB server with over 85 VMs running. Completely frozen and unresponsive, qemu-dm processes hung on event channels. I''m using the XenServer 6.0 dom0 kernel on top of the xen-unstable tip hypervisor. I believe you solved the issue backporting some event channel patches to the 2.6.32 kernel, as described in this thread

My log says suddenly: Dec 14 02:35:16 hp1 kernel: [1492482.232822] o2net: no longer connected to node hp2 (num 1) at 192.168.1.2:7777 Dec 14 02:35:18 hp1 kernel: [1492483.960150] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [kvm:32398] I have no idea what happens here and why - but the result are a lot of problems with virtual machines. Viele Gr??e Andreas Rittershofer -- Hier k?nnte keine Signatur stehen.

...:1468 here are some times that might help debug the situation: (tmr 1240219830.350706 now 1240219860.349653 dr 1240219832.350084 adv 1240219830.350720:1240219830.350721 func (d5a868ed:505) 1240219830.350707:1240219830.350712) Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 [ 9123.585958] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 61s! [awstats.pl:4614] Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 [ 9123.585958] Modules linked in: Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 netconsole Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 nfsd Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 lockd Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 nfs_acl Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 auth_rpcgss Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1 sunrpc Apr 20 17:31:52 um-fe-1...

...-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64_2.6.32-31_amd64.deb but this isnt a workaround really, we tested it on an 40 vmachines dom0 and it just dont work, of course the lvm works but the machine is slow as hell and runs into several kernel errors within a few hours [46566.052925] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [qemu-dm:6292] in this case xentop shows an 500% CPU usage by the dom0, we experience an 85%st value. So, i think this should be fixed soon, so what is the status of the issue? Best whishes Joerg _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource...

...port to 2, like following: echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/eth81/bridge/multicast_router echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/bond2/brport/multicast_router Then soft lockup occured: Message from syslogd at node-0 at Jan 9 15:47:12 ... kernel:BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] And the call trace is RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa04f3608>] [<ffffffffa04f3608>] br_multicast_flood+0x88/0x140 [bridge] RSP: 0018:ffff88013bc038f0 EFLAGS: 00000246 RAX: ffff88404f816020 RBX: ffff88013bc03940 RCX: ffff88204e40a640 RDX: ffff882002b9ce01 RSI: ffff88...

...execve+0x2a/0x4a Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04047aa>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0610000>] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: ======================= Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [sshd:24188] Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Pid: 24188, comm: sshd Not tainted (2.6.25.3 #3) Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c06154f0>] EFLAGS: 00200293 CPU: 7 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x15 Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2...

..., I have upgraded a test machine from OpenSuSE 11.1 to 11.2. I have found following bug: the server is a 2x quadcore intel box also 2x4=8cpu If you limit the dom0 cpu with dom0-cpus= [1-7]: - [xenwatch_cb] is running 100% cpu and makes var log entry every 65 sec BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X stuck for 61s! - xm commands not work - xend is dead if set dom0-cpus to 0 or 8: - everything looks fine Can somebody else confirm that bug? Best regards Udo Attila Fischer ------------------------------ for example: vcpu=7 PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4532 roo...

Hi, In view of the problems I was having with DomU network timeout after a live migration (I posted that problems here a while ago but never got anything except from private emails) I finally updated my Debian/Squeeze Dom0s last night to a new kernel, from 2.6.32-23 to 2.6.32-26. Now live migration just hangs...Any ideas? Xen-related Debian packages (all from Debian repositary, except drbd

...)E*"D@>PH@("`@1$%413TB8&1A=&4@)RLE62TE;2TE9"=@(@H@("`@1$E2 M/2(D0T]2141)4B\D,2XD1$%412(*("`@(&EF(%L@(2`M9"`B)$1)4B(@73L@ M=&AE;@H@("`@("`@(&UK9&ER("(D1$E2(B!\?"!R971U<FX*"B`@("`@("`@ M4$E$4STB8&=E=%]P:61S("0Q8"(*("`@("`@("!I9B!;("(D4$E$4R(@(3T@ M(B(@73L@=&AE;@H)("`@(&EF(%L@)%9%4D)/4T4@/2!Y97, at 73L@=&AE;@H) M"65C:&\@+6X@(B0P.B!.;W1I8V4Z($=E='1I;F<@8V]R92!D=6UP<R!I;B`D M1$E2(&]F("0Q('!R;V-E<W-E<SHB(#XF, at H)("...

...g about it. As it turns out, the problem was already fixed. If you're working on LLVM, and using the GNU linker, I _highly_ _highly_ _highly_ recommend grabbing the CVS version of binutils (http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/) and using it. For me, it reduced the TTLO (time to link opt) from 61s to 9s (on a 3.2ghz P4 Xeon). -Chris -- http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/ http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

All, using Samba as an AD (2k12) domain member in Stretch (2:4.5.12+dfsg-2+deb9u4) with tdb as default and rid as domain backend. No overlapping. Everything works fine. Setup was done as in the wiki [1]. If you're connecting from a Windows 10 client and do not add dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab winbind refresh tickets = Yes to

Hi, I''ve been trying to boot stefano''s minimal dom0 kernel from git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git 2.6.36-rc1-initial-domain-v2+pat On xen-unstable, I get the following WARN_ON()''s from Xen when bringing up the NIC''s, then the machine hangs forever when trying to login either over serial or NIC. (XEN) Xen WARN at msi.c:649 (XEN) ----[

Dear all, I know this is more a Digium hardware than an Asterisk issue. Already posted a question at Digium, however also like to see whether anyone in the Asterisk community has encountered the following situation: I installed a Digium B410P BRI PCI card on my new asterisk server, following the steps specified in the manual. I can see the PCI card is available using the lspci command: ...

...4 toddb05 kernel: [97247.496543] RSP <ffff8800e9fa5d38> Dec 30 12:33:14 toddb05 kernel: [97247.496545] CR2: ffff8800ee58ed10 Dec 30 12:33:14 toddb05 kernel: [97247.496549] ---[ end trace b4b6af6cf74297e0 ]--- Dec 30 12:34:18 toddb05 kernel: [97312.148005] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [Xorg:1899] Dec 30 12:34:18 toddb05 kernel: [97312.148005] Modules linked in: rndis_wlan cfg80211 rfkill rndis_host cdc_ether usbnet tun usbbk gntdev netbk blkbk blkback_pagemap blktap domctl xenbus_be evtchn snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_seq snd_seq_device edd fuse nls_utf8 cifs bridge stp llc...

Hello zfs-discuss, Relatively low traffic to the pool but sync takes too long to complete and other operations are also not that fast. Disks are on 3510 array. zil_disable=1. bash-3.00# ptime sync real 1:21.569 user 0.001 sys 0.027 During sync zpool iostat and vmstat look like: f3-1 504G 720G 370 859 995K 10.2M misc 20.6M 52.0G 0 0