Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "618f2548".
Did you mean:
1882548
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] BasicCallGraph patch
...one. Is there any better
way to do this? I guess carrying debug information in LLVM IR might help.
But I don't know how to use the debug information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070717/618f2548/attachment.html>
2007 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] BasicCallGraph patch
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
> I am doing inter-procedural static analysis, so I need to do DFS of call
> graph. llvm-gcc sometimes generates this kind of call instruction, which
> cause the call graph to be incomplete.
>
> But thanks for your information, instcombine really solves the problem.
Happy to help. You'll probably find that other optimizations help as
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] BasicCallGraph patch
I am doing inter-procedural static analysis, so I need to do DFS of call
graph. llvm-gcc sometimes generates this kind of call instruction, which
cause the call graph to be incomplete.
But thanks for your information, instcombine really solves the problem.
On 7/17/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Zhongxing Xu wrote:
> > The current