search for: 618f2548

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "618f2548".

Did you mean: 1882548
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] BasicCallGraph patch
...one. Is there any better way to do this? I guess carrying debug information in LLVM IR might help. But I don't know how to use the debug information. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070717/618f2548/attachment.html>
2007 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] BasicCallGraph patch
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Zhongxing Xu wrote: > I am doing inter-procedural static analysis, so I need to do DFS of call > graph. llvm-gcc sometimes generates this kind of call instruction, which > cause the call graph to be incomplete. > > But thanks for your information, instcombine really solves the problem. Happy to help. You'll probably find that other optimizations help as
2007 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] BasicCallGraph patch
I am doing inter-procedural static analysis, so I need to do DFS of call graph. llvm-gcc sometimes generates this kind of call instruction, which cause the call graph to be incomplete. But thanks for your information, instcombine really solves the problem. On 7/17/07, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Zhongxing Xu wrote: > > The current