search for: 6178cdf6

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 30 Jan 2015 21:24, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > > The library is agnostic of the unwinder, the driver is who cares (as it > needs to generate the linker invocation). I think that adding a flag to > control that similar to -rtlib is probably what

On 30 Jan 2015 21:24, "Saleem Abdulrasool" <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > The library is agnostic of the unwinder, the driver is who cares (as it needs to generate the linker invocation). I think that adding a flag to control that similar to -rtlib is probably what we may have to do then. What about the default unwinder for Compiler-RT? Should we assume our own?

...s can easily change the default behaviour with the > flag if they desire. > Shouldn't it just use the default unwinder for the given platform? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150130/6178cdf6/attachment.html>