search for: 61752

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "61752".

Did you mean: 1752
2003 Oct 09
1
2.2.5 performanc issues...
We are trying to troubleshoot slow performance. A lot of my NT client log files show messages like this about oplock break issues. [2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2 64 [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(409) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 982, port 61752, dev =...
1995 Jul 01
0
To those interested in the foreign FreeBSD secure code.
Hi The number of people who have had something to contribute here is is GREAT! For those not in the know, there is an initiative afoot to get a South African CVS site going that will contain the cryptography code that is otherwise illegal to get out of the USA. There has already been a fair amount of discussion about the code and the site, but mail is now getting difficult to deal with. I have
2009 Oct 06
2
Proxy setup & upgrade from 1.0.3 to 1.1.7
...7 Info: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=8137 dovecot: Oct 06 10:37:39 Info: auth(default): new auth connection: pid=8139 dovecot: Oct 06 10:37:39 Info: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=imap secured lip=80.149.64.98 rip=217.91.33.32 lport=993 rport=61752 resp=<hidden> dovecot: Oct 06 10:37:39 Info: auth(default): cache(adrian.wojcicki,217.91.33.32): miss dovecot: Oct 06 10:37:39 Info: auth(default): passwd-file(testuser1,217.91.33.32): lookup: user=testuser1 file=/etc/dovecot/dovecot.passdb dovecot: Oct 06 10:37:39 Info: auth(default):...
2004 Nov 17
9
serious networking (em) performance (ggate and NFS) problem
Dear best guys, I really love 5.3 in many ways but here're some unbelievable transfer rates, after I went out and bought a pair of Intel GigaBit Ethernet Cards to solve my performance problem (*laugh*): (In short, see *** below) Tests were done with two Intel GigaBit Ethernet cards (82547EI, 32bit PCI Desktop adapter MT) connected directly without a switch/hub and "device