Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "6128c89d".
2012 Sep 20
0
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
...we should change it to take an
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<char>, rather than relying on a character buffer
"which must be of sufficient size".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120920/6128c89d/attachment.html>
2012 Sep 20
3
[LLVMdev] Handling of unsafe functions
On Sep 20, 2012, at 3:01 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Martinez, Javier E
> <javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote:
>> We have identified functions in LLVM sources using a static code analyzer
>> which are marked as a “security vulnerability”[1][2]. There has been work
>> already done to address some of