Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "6111e909".
Did you mean:
1118909
2015 Dec 16
2
Status of "llvm.pcmarker" intrinsic?
There seems to be semantic overlap with stackmap, patchpoint, and
statepoint as well.
I suspect we should remove pcmarker and forward serialize it in bitcode
as a nop.
Philip
On 12/16/2015 02:14 PM, Justin Bogner via llvm-dev wrote:
> Rob Lyerly via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:
>> I've seen previous messages about "llvm.pcmarker" not being