Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "60x200".
Did you mean:
0x200
2010 Aug 26
2
Speeding up transpose
...0.039 3.163
user system elapsed user system elapsed
3.803 0.271 4.075 3.868 0.296 4.163
user system elapsed user system elapsed
4.184 0.273 4.457 4.238 0.302 4.540
So with the modification, transpose for a 60x200 or 200x60 matrix is
about a factor of two faster on the Intel system, and a factor of six
faster on the SPARC system. There is little or no gain from the
modification when transposing a row or column vector, however. (I
think it must be that on these machines multiplies and divides do not
take co...