search for: 60659b73

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "60659b73".

Did you mean: 606593
2016 Dec 29
0
RFC: Inline expansion of memcmp vs call to standard library
Improving lowering for memcmp is definitely something we should do for all targets. Doing it in a target specific way is decidedly non-ideal. It looks like we already have some code in SelectionDAGBuilder which tries to optimize the lowering for the memcpy library call. I am a bit confused by the problem you are trying to solve. Are you specifically interested in lowering for constant
2016 Dec 30
2
RFC: Inline expansion of memcmp vs call to standard library
...________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161229/60659b73/attachment.html>