search for: 600million

...oduction level. So, I scrapped the lot, went to xfs and haven't had a problem since. > > I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and seems to hate being hammered with reads/writes. Personally, on all my mail spools, I use XFS or EXT4. OUr servers here handle 600million messages a month without trouble on those filesystems. > > Just my $0.02. Btrfs appears rather useful because the disks are SSDs, because it allows me to create subvolumes and because it handles SSDs nicely. Unfortunately, the SSDs are not suited for hardware RAID. The only alternative I kn...

Hi, is there anything that speaks against putting a cyrus mail spool onto a btrfs subvolume?

...haven't had a problem since. >>> >>> I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and >>> seems to hate being hammered with reads/writes. Personally, on all >>> my mail spools, I use XFS or EXT4.? OUr servers here handle >>> 600million messages a month without trouble on those filesystems. >>> >>> Just my $0.02. >> >> Btrfs appears rather useful because the disks are SSDs, because it >> allows me to create subvolumes and because it handles SSDs nicely. >> Unfortunately, the SSDs are not s...

...ed production level.? So, I scrapped the lot, went to xfs and haven't had a problem since. I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and seems to hate being hammered with reads/writes.? Personally, on all my mail spools, I use XFS or EXT4.? OUr servers here handle 600million messages a month without trouble on those filesystems. Just my $0.02. -- Mark Haney Network Engineer at NeoNova 919-460-3330 option 1 mark.haney at neonova.net www.neonova.net

...level. So, I scrapped the lot, went to xfs and haven't had a problem since. >> >> I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and seems to hate being hammered with reads/writes. Personally, on all my mail spools, I use XFS or EXT4. OUr servers here handle 600million messages a month without trouble on those filesystems. >> >> Just my $0.02. > > Btrfs appears rather useful because the disks are SSDs, because it > allows me to create subvolumes and because it handles SSDs nicely. > Unfortunately, the SSDs are not suited for hardware RAID....

...So, I scrapped the > lot, went to xfs and haven't had a problem since. > > I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and seems to > hate being hammered with reads/writes. Personally, on all my mail spools, I > use XFS or EXT4. OUr servers here handle 600million messages a month > without trouble on those filesystems. > > Just my $0.02. > -- > > Mark Haney > Network Engineer at NeoNova > 919-460-3330 option 1 > mark.haney at neonova.net > www.neonova.net > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mai...

...scrapped the lot, went to xfs and haven't had a problem since. >>>> >>>> I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and seems to hate being hammered with reads/writes. Personally, on all my mail spools, I use XFS or EXT4. OUr servers here handle 600million messages a month without trouble on those filesystems. >>>> >>>> Just my $0.02. >>> >>> Btrfs appears rather useful because the disks are SSDs, because it >>> allows me to create subvolumes and because it handles SSDs nicely. >>> Unfortuna...

...;>>> >>>>> I'm not sure why you'd want your mail spool on a filesystem and >>>>> seems to hate being hammered with reads/writes. Personally, on all >>>>> my mail spools, I use XFS or EXT4.? OUr servers here handle >>>>> 600million messages a month without trouble on those filesystems. >>>>> >>>>> Just my $0.02. >>>> >>>> Btrfs appears rather useful because the disks are SSDs, because it >>>> allows me to create subvolumes and because it handles SSDs nicely. &g...