Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "6.6683".
Did you mean:
6.6673
2014 Sep 09
1
[LLVMdev] Please benchmark new x86 vector shuffle lowering, planning to make it the default very soon!
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com <mailto:qcolombet at apple.com>> wrote:
> Hi Chandler,
>
> I had observed some improvements and regressions with the new lowering.
>
> Here are the numbers for an Ivy Bridge machine fixed at
2014 Sep 09
5
[LLVMdev] Please benchmark new x86 vector shuffle lowering, planning to make it the default very soon!
Hi Chandler,
Thanks for fixing the problem with the insertps mask.
Generally the new shuffle lowering looks promising, however there are
some cases where the codegen is now worse causing runtime performance
regressions in some of our internal codebase.
You have already mentioned how the new shuffle lowering is missing
some features; for example, you explicitly said that we currently lack
of