search for: 5te

Hi JM, I am using narrowband mode with speex qaulity set to 0 and complexity set to 4. The code works fine on the 3.2GHz processor. The test program speexenc takes 7ms to encode 5sec worth of voice on the 3.2Ghz processor. The same takes 700ms on the ARM5E intel Xscale. The code that I wrote puts 10 speex frames in one RTP packet. When exexcuted on ARM I get lots of underrruns hence

...for 5 seconds of speech would mean using only 0.2% of your 533 MHz chip, or about 1 MIPS. That's simply not possible using any modern speech codec, so you'll have to either change that requirement or deal with uncompressed (or very lightly compressed) audio. > Is the option --enable-arm5te-asm supported? I am using speex 1.1.12 > version. The configure.ac file does not seem to support > --enable-arm5te-asm option. I tried --enable-arm5e-asm but the result > is'nt much different. Real time is not possible at that rate. > Processor is Xscale 533MHz. --enable-arm5e-asm...

...would mean using only 0.2% of your 533 MHz chip, or about 1 > MIPS. That's simply not possible using any modern speech codec, so > you'll have to either change that requirement or deal with > uncompressed (or very lightly compressed) audio. > >> Is the option --enable-arm5te-asm supported? I am using speex >> 1.1.12 version. The configure.ac file does not seem to support >> --enable-arm5te-asm option. I tried --enable-arm5e-asm but the >> result is'nt much different. Real time is not possible at that >> rate. Processor is Xscale 533MHz. &gt...

Hello everyone, Can any body please tell me the compiler options to optimise the speex code for ARM TE architecture. Fixed point is enabled. It currently takes about 700ms to encode 5 sec worth of voice. I need to get it down to under 10ms. Is the option --enable-arm5te-asm supported? I am using speex 1.1.12 version. The configure.ac file does not seem to support --enable-arm5te-asm option. I tried --enable-arm5e-asm but the result is'nt much different. Real time is not possible at that rate. Processor is Xscale 533MHz. TIA nav ---------------...

Hi, I'm trying to get speex working on an ARM board (ARM926EJ-Sid(wb) core, ARM 5TE architecture) and getting segfaults if build with "--enable-fixed-point --enable-arm5e-asm" options. If I use just "--enable-fixed-point", then it runs fine, but once I add "--enable-arm5e-asm" it start crashing (I use testenc to test it). Further investigation showed...

On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 20:37 +0300, Timo Sirainen wrote: > It says "tried to use unsupported auth mechanism". In your later mail > you say that telnet shows AUTH=GSSAPI in capabilities. So that would > mean that the client isn't using AUTHENTICATE GSSAPI but something > else. I'd been considering that perhaps my version of Evolution was too old, so I upgraded from

...7oDl1cXPz7s+53AXe7rr9HoCheavTu7h682l2nPkw8+U1j ZiwXXstZtf5eG/K+wDe8omDzehDB5SaqeZ2nQNtr7CeRxgBGpDjtajVf5jkFf2GBDsZDeoG ABLAF++RcLxdyDQvVRFe0EeLs1qUXxX9ThNwTmnbCfRpIHRMIHOoAMCARKigcYEgcP4Mqy1 HrNRK79HY89oRG9tpP0FyDuWd38xXd/pKfqFl0NDkENdBHXUSsyOVKYsNFSncf1EIRL2s1s fWnV1Folk2HB/JvtEJD3eA1+f5wSXiT5pcmc/5tE+Bdf8n8wC0ExGx3RrM0cffjr/CgR7SE 6z9MHUn2UPGIFyoq7zDFrD5ILV5KyZd2zm86prr8tziEZ3wmYQbVsx3rEG1lJ193Z++S2yj 57+fGoJ7jA56GXNChfB/hFNx4xs2QSzCjccy0D+3RI= 1441680001.087279 1441680001.087982 BQQE/wAMAAAAAAAAFP2szwH///9yYW5iaXKB/Devj+/oz2utdNs= Here's the out rawlog: 1441680000.950204 * OK [CAPABILIT...

...Also, if you can do some investigation, it would be useful to check what bit of assembly is causing the crash. Can you disable one at a time and check? Jean-Marc Alexander Chemeris a ?crit : > Hi, > > I'm trying to get speex working on an ARM board (ARM926EJ-Sid(wb) core, > ARM 5TE architecture) and getting segfaults if build with "--enable-fixed-point > --enable-arm5e-asm" options. If I use just "--enable-fixed-point", then > it runs fine, but once I add "--enable-arm5e-asm" it start crashing > (I use testenc to test it). > > Fur...

I was trying to using llvm to targeting ARMv5TE -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180314/b9dadc37/attachment.html>

...; 0x30 > ... > > I'm not 100% sure if that's the correct ISA, because I haven't run the > code, but it seems ok. > Unfortunately, I have to resurrect this thread. I had the time to test the code, and it is using the wrong ISA. I can't understand why, but it uses armv5te instead of thumb2. $ clang++ -ccc-gcc-name arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ -ccc-host-triple thumbv7m-none-gnueabi testReference.cpp -c $ arm-none-linux-gnueabi-readelf -A testReference.o Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes Tag_CPU_name: "5TE" Tag_CPU_arch: v5TE Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes...

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > On 18 July 2012 15:46, salvatore benedetto > <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: >> $ clang++ -ccc-host-triple thumbv7m-none-gnueabi noInclude.cpp -c >> --sysroot=/home/emitrax/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_G++_Lite/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/ > > Try -ccc-gcc-name

On 18 July 2012 15:46, salvatore benedetto <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote: > $ clang++ -ccc-host-triple thumbv7m-none-gnueabi noInclude.cpp -c > --sysroot=/home/emitrax/CodeSourcery/Sourcery_G++_Lite/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/libc/ Try -ccc-gcc-name arm-none-linux-gnueabi-g++ -ccc-host-triple thumbv7m-none-linux-gnueabi Sometimes it's better than sysroot, as it finds it