search for: 5sec

X-Lite build 1079 consistently chokes no matter which codec I use - after five seconds I suddenly have no sound coming in and possibly no sound going out too. Putting the line I'm on on hold and then switching back to it gives me another five seconds of sound, then it dies, etc. The Grandstream 101 I'm using is a piece of junk but I don't have the same problem with it. Not sure

I need to execute account number, device number after dialing main number; what is the best solution? Is it possible to pause during dialing. Dial 1-800-number press 1 for English wait 5sec enter device number wait 5sec enter device ID What are my best options? -- #Joseph

This is troubling. Shouldn't your hubs/routers autosense the 10MBPS? ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: WipeOut <wipe_out@lycos.co.uk> Reply-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 07:53:13 +0100 >Steven J. Sobol wrote: > >>On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jon Pounder wrote: >> >> >>Nothing works. Call transfer

...o it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Asterisk-Users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Digium should develop and sell just Dummy card. For timing... (Adam Hart) > 2. Re: My Grandstream works, > but my X-Lite doesn't:no sound after 5sec (rnc Info Lists) > 3. Re: Wildcard TDM400P - FXO? (Steve Meyers) > 4. e100p in Australia (Stephen Dredge) > 5. Re: DISA and ringing tone (John Todd) > 6. Re: My Grandstream works, but my X-Lite doesn't: > no sound after 5sec (WipeOut) > 7. Re: Digium should dev...

...g), and traffic rate drop from 100 to 20mbit. What can be wrong? The only change I see is htb2 -> htb3 Here is my qdiscs/classes/filters example qdisc htb 1: dev eth0 r2q 10 default 2500 direct_packets_stat 4604 ver 3.13 qdisc sfq 100: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 5sec qdisc sfq 3300: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 5sec qdisc sfq 3301: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 5sec qdisc sfq 3302: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024 perturb 5sec qdisc sfq 3304: dev eth0 quantum 1514b limit 128p flows 128/1024...

Dear R users, I have copied for following table from an article on "Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs": Subject 1sec 2sec 5sec 1 10 13 13 12.00 2 6 8 8 7.33 3 11 14 14 13.00 4 22 23 25 23.33 5 16 18 20 18.00 6 15 17 17 16.33 7 1 1 4 2.00 8 12 15 17 14.67 9 9 12 12 11.00 10 8 9 12 9.67 I rearranged the data this way: >subject<-factor(c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10)) >condition<...

.../asterisk/monitor/entrada/) exten => s, n, Set(DYNAMIC_FEATURES = hangup#pickupexten#atxfer#blidxfer) exten => s, n, MixMonitor(${CALLFILENAME}/${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%d%m%Y-%H:%M:%S)}-${EXTEN}.wav|v(0)V(0)) exten => s, n, Wait,1 exten => s, n, Set(TIMEOUT(digit)=3) ; Set Digit Timeout to 5sec exten => s, n, Set(TIMEOUT(response)=5) ; Set Response Timeout to 10sec exten => s, n, Background(bemvindobit) exten => s, n, WaitExten exten => 1, 1, Set(LANGUAGE()=pt_BR) exten => 1, 2, Queue(8600|tT|||30) exten => 2, 1, Set(LANGUAGE()=pt_BR) exten => 2, 2, Queue(8500|tT|||30...

...asterisk, doesn't matter how hard I tried. Despite simple configuration, the unit wouldn't register with asterisk even with their tech. support instructions. Their manual is short on detail as well. Another poor design is the "magic button" by the power supply. If pressed by 5sec. it will reset to default IP not the one set from the factory but to 192.168.0.1. Imagine a cleaning lady dusting or rearranging and holding the unit for 5sec.; you come back to work in the morning and none of the 4-phones are working. So, from my experience the unit is not worth consideration, y...

Hi, I run two live c-class subnets on the internet. Last Sunday morning I was hit with a DDoS attack and it hasn''t stopped. I made modifications on my shorewall firewall during Sunday to lesson the impact, as they were hammering me with 180k/5sec traffic both ways (inbound and outbound). One of the primary things which helped reduce their DDoS was enabling "norfc1918" on the interfaces (this stopped about 95% of the barrage), but I also enabled routefilter,dropunclean,blacklist and tcpflags. The blacklist feature unfortunately d...

...0 0.0 0.0 0 100 md/d52 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 334.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 100 100 c3t2d0 kr/s & kw/s show 0, but wait is 334, at this, the application always hang. # dtrace -n ''io:::start { @files[pid, execname, args[2]->fi_pathname] = sum(args[0]->b_bcount); } tick-5sec { exit(); }'' dtrace: description ''io:::start '' matched 7 probes CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 8 49675 :tick-5sec 16189 nTrade /export/data/dbxpt3/logs/ledgers/arinapt3.NTRPT3-MOCA.trans_outmsg.ledger 32768 25456 pt_chmod...

...2,2,2,2,2,2,2,2))) cs = factor(rep(c("yes","no"),c(8,8))) sub = factor(sort(spaeVP)) rati = stack(data.frame(arousal)) rati = rati[,1] rating.df <- data.frame(sub, cs, spk, rati) summary(aov(rati ~ cs*spk + Error(sub/(cs*spk)), data=rating.df)) I get this Error (after about 5sec): Error in "names<-.default"(`*tmp*`, value = nmstrata) : names attribute must be the same length as the vector > rating.df sub cs spk rati 1 5 yes spk1 -1 2 5 yes spk1 0 3 5 yes spk2 1 4 5 yes spk2 0 5 5 yes spk3 0 6 5 yes spk3 -1 7...

...ree (in the remote glusterfs filesystem) when everything is up to date ("MAKE"); i.e., after make has checked all 800 or so source files it tells you that there is nothing to do. I am afraid my timings speak for themselves: CP-A MAKE local disk < 5sec < 0.3sec NFS (100MBit) 55sec+-2sec < 2sec glusterfs (I) 4m29sec 17sec glusterfs (II) 4m05sec 18sec (I) unpatched fuse.ko, (II) patched fuse.ko, both over the same network as NFS. Note that in (II) the modified kernel module wa...

Hi My simulation with the followin R code works perfectly: sim <- replicate(999, sum(exp(rgamma(rpois(1,2000), scale = 0.5, shape = 12)))) But now I do not want to have values in object "sim" exceeding 5'000'000, that means that I am just using the beginning of densitiy function gamma x < 15.4. Is there a possibility to modify my code in an easy way? Thanks for any help!

Hi JM, I am using narrowband mode with speex qaulity set to 0 and complexity set to 4. The code works fine on the 3.2GHz processor. The test program speexenc takes 7ms to encode 5sec worth of voice on the 3.2Ghz processor. The same takes 700ms on the ARM5E intel Xscale. The code that I wrote puts 10 speex frames in one RTP packet. When exexcuted on ARM I get lots of underrruns hence noise. I was wondering perhaps its because of the speed of ARM processor as dictated by the s...

Hi all, How to dtrace a who is writing a veritas volume? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20070412/dfd8c254/attachment.html>

Is it possible dor a domU to go backwards in time for instance 5sec former to reproduce a quick event for instance ? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/xen-backwards-tp16646386p16646386.html Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xenso...

Prospective user question? What is the simplest/inexpensive board to use in order to be able to receive faxes in Asterisk. I have a couple of cards I bought off E-bay think they were TX-1000 (or supposed to be anyways) but I assume I need some form of fax card though. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_SNDBUF=131072 SO_RCVBUF=131072. We've moved 200 of the 600 PCs from Novell/Samba combo to all Samba shares. Does anyone see a problem with moving the remaining 400? At ramp-up (beginning of class switch) we moved a 37MB file from one Samba share to another in about 65sec. Also a 5MB file from C: to a Samba share in 5sec. Bill -- /------------------------------------------------------\ | | | William E. Jojo, Jr. | | |...

Anyone else seen this one? > > ping -n {remote host} > { 6 second delay } > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=6sec > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=5sec > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4sec > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=3sec > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=2sec > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=1sec > 64 bytes from 216.168.105.33: icm...

...ty anyway, so I don't see why you'd want to use it. Jean-Marc Naveed Rehman a ?crit : > Hi JM, > > I am using narrowband mode with speex qaulity set to 0 and complexity > set to 4. The code works fine on the 3.2GHz processor. The test > program speexenc takes 7ms to encode 5sec worth of voice on the > 3.2Ghz processor. The same takes 700ms on the ARM5E intel Xscale. The > code that I wrote puts 10 speex frames in one RTP packet. When > exexcuted on ARM I get lots of underrruns hence noise. I was > wondering perhaps its because of the speed of ARM processor as...