search for: 5ff

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "5ff".

Did you mean: 5f
2007 Jul 06
0
XEN Bridging, Natting and VPN
...logins to a VPN server on the public network (via eth0) and it can route traffic requests from one network to another. This is the configuration: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:05:AC:15:26 inet addr:xxxxxxx Bcast:xxxxxxxx Mask:255.255.252.0 inet6 addr: fe80::230:5ff:feac:1526/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:A7:16:AC:E6 inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::210:a7ff:fe16:ace6/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST...
2014 Nov 05
1
centos-7 reinstall
I have a test system that I am using to investigate CentOS-7. I note the following difficulty when booting from the Minimal Install DVD. Neither on the initial install nor on subsequent attempts at re-installing CentOS-7 can I set the IPv4 interface to a static IP address. I can configure it but I cannot save the changes. The save button remains greyed out. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a
2010 Apr 04
1
help with routing and multiple subnets
...rruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:1866 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:500 RX bytes:217507 (212.4 KiB) TX bytes:150135 (146.6 KiB) eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:07:25:81 inet6 addr: fe80::240:5ff:fe07:2581/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:23385 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:19821 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes...
2006 Apr 19
0
AHC Panic
...cks, 0.3% fragmentation) /dev/da0s1e: FILE SYSTEM CLEAN; SKIPPING CHECKS /dev/da0s1e: clean, 177737 free (1441 frags, 22037 blocks, 0.3% fragmentation) Setting hostname: cwtest. vfs.nfsrv.async: 0 -> 1 ed0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::240:5ff:fe55:fe74%ed0 prefixlen 64 tentative scopeid 0x1 inet 10.1.1.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 ether 00:40:05:55:fe:74 ed1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe7d:840b%ed1 prefixlen 64 tentative scopeid 0x2...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...NCTION__.20030>: > +000005fb <__FUNCTION__.19945>: > 5fb: 67 addr16 > 5fc: 65 gs > - 5fd: 74 5f je 65e <__FUNCTION__.20708+0xf> > + 5fd: 74 5f je 65e <__FUNCTION__.20622+0xf> > 5ff: 61 popa > 600: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi) > 601: 69 61 73 5f 73 65 74 imul $0x7465735f,0x73(%ecx),%esp > 608: 5f pop %edi > 609: 65 6e outsb %gs:(%esi),(%dx) > - 60b: 74 72 je...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the
2005 Jun 14
1
Problem with samba broadcast
...ope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:07:95:08:0f:f1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.1/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global eth0 inet6 fe80::207:95ff:fe08:ff1/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:40:05:07:bb:05 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet6 fe80::240:5ff:fe07:bb05/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft fo...