Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "5fd".
Did you mean:
5d
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...f5: 63 74 69 6f arpl %si,0x6f(%ecx,%ebp,2)
> 5f9: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> ...
>
> -000005fb <__FUNCTION__.20030>:
> +000005fb <__FUNCTION__.19945>:
> 5fb: 67 addr16
> 5fc: 65 gs
> - 5fd: 74 5f je 65e <__FUNCTION__.20708+0xf>
> + 5fd: 74 5f je 65e <__FUNCTION__.20622+0xf>
> 5ff: 61 popa
> 600: 6c insb (%dx),%es:(%edi)
> 601: 69 61 73 5f 73 65 74 imul $0x7465735f,0x73(%ec...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the