Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "5f9".
Did you mean:
59
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...je 651 <__FUNCTION__.20622+0x2>
> 5f2: 66 data16
> - 5f3: 75 6e jne 663 <__FUNCTION__.20299>
> + 5f3: 75 6e jne 663 <__FUNCTION__.20214>
> 5f5: 63 74 69 6f arpl %si,0x6f(%ecx,%ebp,2)
> 5f9: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> ...
>
> -000005fb <__FUNCTION__.20030>:
> +000005fb <__FUNCTION__.19945>:
> 5fb: 67 addr16
> 5fc: 65 gs
> - 5fd: 74 5f je 65e <__FUNCTION__.20708+0xf&...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking