search for: 5f202010

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "5f202010".

Did you mean: 202010
2019 Mar 27
3
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...cf;;RS)(A;;RC;;;A > U)(OA;;RP;59ba2f42-79a2-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d3cf;;AU)(OA;;RP;77b5b886-944a-11d1 > -aebd-0000f80367c1;;AU)(OA;;RP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;AU)(OA;; > RP;e48d0154-bcf8-11d1-8702-00c04fb96050;;AU)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-0 > 0aa0040529b;;WD)(OA;;RP;5f202010-79a5-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(OA;;RPWP;bf > 967a7f-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2;;CA)(OA;;RP;46a9b11d-60ae-405a-b7e8-ff8a58 > d456d2;;S-1-5-32-560)(OA;;RPWP;6db69a1c-9422-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;S-1-5-32 > -561)(OA;;RPWP;5805bc62-bdc9-4428-a5e2-856a0f4c185e;;S-1-5-32-561)(OA;CIIOID; &g...
2019 Mar 26
0
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
...11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(A;;RC;;;A U)(OA;;RP;59ba2f42-79a2-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d3cf;;AU)(OA;;RP;77b5b886-944a-11d1 -aebd-0000f80367c1;;AU)(OA;;RP;e45795b3-9455-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;AU)(OA;; RP;e48d0154-bcf8-11d1-8702-00c04fb96050;;AU)(OA;;CR;ab721a53-1e2f-11d0-9819-0 0aa0040529b;;WD)(OA;;RP;5f202010-79a5-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;;RS)(OA;;RPWP;bf 967a7f-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2;;CA)(OA;;RP;46a9b11d-60ae-405a-b7e8-ff8a58 d456d2;;S-1-5-32-560)(OA;;RPWP;6db69a1c-9422-11d1-aebd-0000f80367c1;;S-1-5-32 -561)(OA;;RPWP;5805bc62-bdc9-4428-a5e2-856a0f4c185e;;S-1-5-32-561)(OA;CIIOID; RP;4c164200-20c0...
2019 Mar 26
2
samba 4.9.5 - joining Samba DC to existing Samba AD failed
Hi Tim and Rowland, thanks for Your support! I was thinking about e.g. Python 2.7.15 compatibility (as newer Samba versions require Python3), but You are right, here in DB can be problem - first Samba AD DC was created by migrating Samba3 NT4 domain to Samba4 AD cca week ago (using 'samba-tool domain classicupgrade ...', according to Samba Wiki): On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:14:02 +1300 Tim
2018 Nov 29
2
Different LDAP query in different DC...
...TSecurityDescriptor: O:DAG:DAD:AI(A;CINPID;RPLCRC;;;S-1-5-21-160080369-360138 5002-3131615632-1314)(OA;CIIOID;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768-00aa006e0529;4828c c14-1437-45bc-9b07-ad6f015e5f28;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768-00aa 006e0529;bf967aba-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;5f202010-79a5- 11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;4828cc14-1437-45bc-9b07-ad6f015e5f28;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP; 5f202010-79a5-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;bf967aba-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2;RU) (OA;CIIOID;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;4828cc14-1437-45bc-9b07-ad 6f015e5f28;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c...
2018 Nov 29
2
Different LDAP query in different DC...
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Whilst there are attributes that do not get replicated between DC's, > the majority are, so each DC should allow the same access. > Do you have access to the DC ? > Can you run the search locally ? Sure! As just stated, local access (via ldbsearch against the local SAM) works as expected: root at vdcpp1:~# ldbsearch
2018 Nov 29
2
Different LDAP query in different DC...
Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > S-1-5-21-160080369-3601385002-3131615632-1314 Bingo! Exactly the 'Restricted' group that own the users i use for generico LDAP access! I really think that we have found the trouble! Now... how can i fix it? ;-) And... why that vaule get not propagated?! Thanks. -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66
2018 Nov 01
1
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
...0003 (3) 1: SEC_ACE_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT 1: SEC_ACE_INHERITED_OBJECT_TYPE_PRESENT type : union security_ace_object_type(case 1) type : 5f202010-79a5-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf inherited_type : union security_ace_object_inherited_type(case 2) inherited_type : bf967aba-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2 trustee : S-1-5-32-554...
2018 Nov 01
2
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
I've been been trying to investigate this for sometime now, hence I came to the experts :) I have rejoined all my DC's with new names, see below. ;; ANSWER SECTION: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS psad101zatcrh.<domain>.corp. -> New rebuild, new hostname, RHEL6 to RHEL7 upgrade <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS prdc001zafsrh.<domain>.corp. -> New
2016 Jan 04
0
LDAP permissions - ldbedit/ldapmodify?
...)(OA;CIIOID;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a768-00aa006e05 29;4828cc14-1437-45bc-9b07-ad6f015e5f28;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;4c164200-20c0-11d0-a 768-00aa006e0529;bf967aba-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;5f2020 10-79a5-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;4828cc14-1437-45bc-9b07-ad6f015e5f28;RU)(OA;CI IOID;RP;5f202010-79a5-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;bf967aba-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa0030 49e2;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;4828cc14-1437-45bc -9b07-ad6f015e5f28;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;bc0ac240-79a9-11d0-9020-00c04fc2d4cf;bf96 7aba-0de6-11d0-a285-00aa003049e2;RU)(OA;CIIOID;RP;59ba2f42-79a2-11d0-9020-00...
2016 Jan 04
2
LDAP permissions - ldbedit/ldapmodify?
Hi, A while ago I successfully set permissions on a section of my LDAP / AD tree, using either ADUC or ADSIEDIT (I forget which). These permissions allowed my own user to access this section of the tree; I removed permissions for 'Domain Admins' etc. to ensure that others would not be able to view or change the data - this has worked great for many months. I have just tried to add a new