search for: 5f0409f6

...uessed that the DIBuilder infrastructure would have ended up doing that automagically for me, but maybe that was an incorrect assumption? Thanks, -matt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120424/5f0409f6/attachment.html>

On 24 April 2012 16:04, Matt Pharr <matt.pharr at gmail.com> wrote: > When I generate debug information for a source file that has a number of static functions that are unused, all of the debugging metadata that I generated for them during initial compilation remains even after the source function definitions have been stripped out of the IR.  (e.g. in the MD for DW_TAG_compile_unit's

When I generate debug information for a source file that has a number of static functions that are unused, all of the debugging metadata that I generated for them during initial compilation remains even after the source function definitions have been stripped out of the IR. (e.g. in the MD for DW_TAG_compile_unit's list of subprograms, each of those functions' info is still in the list,