search for: 5e83053d

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "5e83053d".

Did you mean: 583053
2004 Aug 21
1
[LLVMdev] More Encoding Ideas
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > > It's 127 right, not 63? Also, what does this have to do with sbyte vs > > ubyte? > > No, its 63. Signed bit takes up one bit and "continue bit" takes up > another so signed values 0-63 get the first byte and 64-127 get the > second, etc. Just to clarify, it's actually -64 -> 63 that are one byte values.