search for: 5e085342

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "5e085342".

Did you mean: 5.058342
2011 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] type system rewrite terminology
...quot;identifiers" be a better term than "variables" here? I don't really know, but variables make me think of things that, well, vary. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110811/5e085342/attachment.html>
2011 Aug 11
1
[LLVMdev] type system rewrite terminology
Hi James, Sorry I missed this. Please send things to the list, not to me directly. On Jul 20, 2011, at 9:52 PM, james woodyatt wrote: > One thing that springs to mind after reading the <http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt> note is that the vocabulary seems a bit confusing. > >> This argues for terminology along the lines of: >> >> Named
2011 Jul 18
4
[LLVMdev] questions about the type system rewrite
Hi, Question 1: Will the new type system allow to incrementally build structs (instead of filling all the fields in one go, as in the example given in <http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt>? Question 2: Will the ocaml bindings to be updated to work with the new type system once the merging of the rewrite to the main branch is done? Thanks very much, N