Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "5e085342".
Did you mean:
5.058342
2011 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] type system rewrite terminology
...quot;identifiers" be a better term than "variables" here? I don't really
know, but variables make me think of things that, well, vary.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110811/5e085342/attachment.html>
2011 Aug 11
1
[LLVMdev] type system rewrite terminology
Hi James,
Sorry I missed this. Please send things to the list, not to me directly.
On Jul 20, 2011, at 9:52 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
> One thing that springs to mind after reading the <http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt> note is that the vocabulary seems a bit confusing.
>
>> This argues for terminology along the lines of:
>>
>> Named
2011 Jul 18
4
[LLVMdev] questions about the type system rewrite
Hi,
Question 1: Will the new type system allow to incrementally build structs (instead
of filling all the fields in one go, as in the example given in
<http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/TypeSystemRewrite.txt>?
Question 2: Will the ocaml bindings to be updated to work with the new type system
once the merging of the rewrite to the main branch is done?
Thanks very much,
N