Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "5d9f8231".
Did you mean:
598231
2016 May 31
0
[RFC] Thoughts on a bitcode symbol table
...g
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
--
Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson at google.com | 408-460-2413
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160531/5d9f8231/attachment.html>
2016 May 27
3
[RFC] Thoughts on a bitcode symbol table
This is about https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27551.
Currently there is no easy way to get symbol information out of
bitcode files. One has to read the module and mangle the names. This
has a few problem
* During lto we have to create the Module earlier.
* There is no convenient spot to store flags/summary.
* Simpler tools like llvm-nm have massive dependencies because Object
depends on MC