Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "5d10f0c7".
2009 Jul 21
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
We've used the used attribute to ensure they are not deleted and had no problem.
Andrew
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:07 AM, <Sanjiv.Gupta at microchip.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> Apparently, there is no explicit support for ISRs in the llvm framework. I
> could not find a matching attribute that can be used to mark a function as
> an ISR, which codegen and optimizer can use
2009 Jul 21
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM and Interrupt Service Routines.
Hi,
Apparently, there is no explicit support for ISRs in the llvm framework. I could not find a matching attribute that can be used to mark a function as an ISR, which codegen and optimizer can use accordingly. ISRs aren't called explicity from any function, so currently the optimizer deletes them. We are planning to introduce a new "interrupt" attribute (to be modeled similiar to