Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "5c7b9209".
2016 Jan 21
2
Adding support for self-modifying branches to LLVM?
...act of the
instructions emitted. This is absolutely our experience as well. I
don't intend for anything I said above to imply otherwise.
Philip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160121/5c7b9209/attachment.html>
2016 Jan 19
4
Adding support for self-modifying branches to LLVM?
Hi,
I’m thinking about using LLVM to implement a limited form of self-modifying
code. Before diving into that, I’d like to get some feedback from you all.
*The goal:* I’d like to add “optional” code to a program that I can enable
at runtime and that has zero (i.e., as close to zero as I can get) overhead
when not enabled.
*Existing solutions:* Currently, I can guard optional code using a