Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "5c1".
Did you mean:
51
2003 Oct 03
1
How to list members of a workgroup
Hi
I look for a way to generate a text file, holding the workgroup/user
relation - which users belongs to a workgroup. Can I use a samba tool to
list all members of any known group? Or maybe run a domain ctlr, and
lookup the information in files on the server?
I must get this info from a M$ lan with arround 20.000 workstations and
some hudreds servers.
Brgds Jorgen
2004 Apr 14
1
"A device attached to the system is not functioning"
...s
browseable = no
An extract from the /etc/samba/smbpasswd, where Frodo is the NETBIOS
name of the workstation.
Frodo$:1013:B5A740276D3ECCA304D5DCD03D39A27A:A719EC89B9D1ADDBA2899135EF3
AB859:[W ]:LCT-4064A7C0:
anna:1016:17355B639265D301AAD3B435B51404EE:80261BBFF0568C419F3B657EA8BBA
5C1:[U ]:LCT-4062F759:
2007 Oct 14
1
This is a fsck log,what's the problem?
...\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checksum for long file name ":91e.bmp".
(Short name 031\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checksum for long file name ":5c1.bmp".
(Short name 032\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checksum for long file name ":922.bmp".
(Short name 033\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checks...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...FUNCTION__.22845
> 00000020 l O .bss 000000d4 static_reg_base_value
> 0000010c l O .bss 00000001 memory_modified.b
> 00003f00 l F .text 0000005b memory_modified_1
> 0000000c l O .bss 00000004 old_reg_base_value
> 000005d5 l O .rodata 0000000f .str8
> -000005c1 l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.23098
> -000005e4 l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.22989
> +000005c1 l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.23005
> +000005e4 l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.22896
> 00004e90 l F .text 000003ca write_dependence_p
> -0000060f l...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the