search for: 5bllvm

...t When I do llc --version, it says LLVM 9.0.0 instead of 8.0.0 LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 9.0.0svn DEBUG build with assertions. Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev%40lists.llvm.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bllvm-dev%5D%20LLVM%208.0.0%20Release&In-Reply-To=%3CCAB8jPhe6LyFVNOR%3DHuAN2L4eDumv%3D15f895Oz9u4NmkcgTLWHA%40mail.gmail.com%3E> Wed Mar 20 05:14:45 PDT 2019 I'm pleased to announce that LLVM 8 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#8.0.0 This release contai...

...Engineer Enflame Technology Co. Website: http://www.enflame-tech.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- [llvm-dev] Per-write cycle count with ReadAdvance *Pierre-Andre Saulais via llvm-dev* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev%40lists.llvm.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bllvm-dev%5D%20Per-write%20cycle%20count%20with%20ReadAdvance&In-Reply-To=%3C565C3F99.9060206%40codeplay.com%3E> *Mon Nov 30 04:22:49 PST 2015* - Previous message: [llvm-dev] difference with autotools, cmake and ninja building methods <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-No...

...o. > Website: http://www.enflame-tech.com/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > [llvm-dev] Per-write cycle count with ReadAdvance > *Pierre-Andre Saulais via llvm-dev* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > <llvm-dev%40lists.llvm.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bllvm-dev%5D%20Per-write%20cycle%20count%20with%20ReadAdvance&In-Reply-To=%3C565C3F99.9060206%40codeplay.com%3E> > *Mon Nov 30 04:22:49 PST 2015* > > > - Previous message: [llvm-dev] difference with autotools, cmake and > ninja building methods > <http://lists.llvm.or...

...passes? Can anyone give me some advice? Thank you! Best Regards Star Tan. PS: I have updated my GSoC proposal. You can access the application on https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808 or on https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808/raw/c041e001300e3502403eb4071e9556a6eb2b7fd5/%5BGSoc2013%5D%5BLLVM-Polly%5D+Reducing+Polly+Compiling+Overhead I would submit the proposal in recent days. Any comments or advice would be appreciated. Thank you! At 2013-04-26 11:08:02,tanmx_star <tanmx_star at yeah.net> wrote: >Hi all, > >I have updated my GSoS proposal: "FastPolly: Reducing LL...

...p://www.enflame-tech.com/ >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> [llvm-dev] Per-write cycle count with ReadAdvance >> *Pierre-Andre Saulais via llvm-dev* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> <llvm-dev%40lists.llvm.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bllvm-dev%5D%20Per-write%20cycle%20count%20with%20ReadAdvance&In-Reply-To=%3C565C3F99.9060206%40codeplay.com%3E> >> *Mon Nov 30 04:22:49 PST 2015* >> >> >> - Previous message: [llvm-dev] difference with autotools, cmake and >> ninja building methods >>...

...t When I do llc --version, it says LLVM 9.0.0 instead of 8.0.0 LLVM (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 9.0.0svn DEBUG build with assertions. Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev%40lists.llvm.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bllvm-dev%5D%20LLVM%208.0.0%20Release&In-Reply-To=%3CCAB8jPhe6LyFVNOR%3DHuAN2L4eDumv%3D15f895Oz9u4NmkcgTLWHA%40mail.gmail.com%3E> Wed Mar 20 05:14:45 PDT 2019 I'm pleased to announce that LLVM 8 is now available. Get it here: https://llvm.org/releases/download.html#8.0.0 This release contai...

Sanjoy, My answer is that step 3, commuting the multiply with the sign-extends, is invalid, As this is what causes the `udiv` to fault. I think it is invalid with or without the “freeze”, why do you think step 3, the commute, without the “freeze" is valid ? Also, do you think you can come up with an example that does not depend on signed overflow being “undefined” ? Peter

Hi all, I have updated my GSoS proposal: "FastPolly: Reducing LLVM-Polly Compiling overhead" (https://gist.github.com/tanstar/5441808). I think the pass ordering problem you discussed early can be also investigated in this project! Is there any comment or advice about my proposal? I appreciate all your help and advice. Thanks, Star Tan Proposal: