search for: 5bf2f8fe

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > >> And, again, I think this should be function level model, unless specified >> otherwise in the instruction, as it will be the case in 99.9999% of the >> compilations. > > > I actually lobbied with Duncan to use a function default, with instruction > level overrides, but his

I feel like this discussion is getting a bit off track... On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Dmitry Babokin <babokin at gmail.com> wrote: > > I would define the set of transformations, such as (i can help with more > complete list if you prefer): > > - reassociation > - x+0.0=>x > - x*0.0=>0.0 > - x*1.0=>x > - a/b => a* 1/b > -