search for: 5bbc9478

I'm still digesting the proposal in its entirety, but one point I want to call out here: On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Instcombine currently transforms "memcpy(dst, src, 4)" to "load i32 src; > store i32 dst". I guess that's illegal under this model? How about the > related transform

...defined that memcpy is byte by byte not, for example, bit by bit? Why is the destination not identical to the source, with exactly the same bits poison? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161019/5bbc9478/attachment.html>