Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "5af69ee8".
2010 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Talin wrote:
> Quick question - should unions enforce that all member types are unique? I realize that a union of { i32, i32 } doesn't make sense, but should the code actually forbid this?
Either way works for me.
> As far as constants go, as long as the initializer is an exact match for one of the member types, it should be no problem.
Right, please
2010 Jan 12
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
...er types, it should be no problem.
>
> Right, please propose a syntax and a class to use (ConstantUnion?) for it,
>
> -Chris
--
-- Talin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100111/5af69ee8/attachment.html>
2010 Jan 11
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] - Union types, attempt 2
Quick question - should unions enforce that all member types are unique? I
realize that a union of { i32, i32 } doesn't make sense, but should the code
actually forbid this?
As far as constants go, as long as the initializer is an exact match for one
of the member types, it should be no problem.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On