search for: 5a0

...:3c01::8678:acff:fe0d:79c1) 0.783 ms 2600:3c01::8678:acff:fe0d:a641 (2600:3c01::8678:acff:fe0d:a641) 0.834 ms 0.972 ms 2 2600:3c01:3333:4::1 (2600:3c01:3333:4::1) 0.645 ms 0.646 ms 2600:3c01:3333:2::1 (2600:3c01:3333:2::1) 0.508 ms 3 ix-ae-67-0.tcore1.sqn-san-jose.ipv6.as6453.net (2001:5a0:1000:500::a1) 1.059 ms 2001:550:2:3::d9:1 (2001:550:2:3::d9:1) 1.967 ms ix-ae-67-0.tcore1.sqn-san-jose.ipv6.as6453.net (2001:5a0:100 4 be2063.ccr21.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com (2001:550:0:1000::9a36:1a1) 2.340 ms 2001:1890:1fff:415:192:205:37:69 (2001:1890:1fff:415:192:205:37:69) 3.209 ms 4.4...

On 4/28/2020 3:17 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > - gateway sends a router solicitation and gets a router advertisement > with "stateful config" set, which tells gateway to do DHCPv6 (but > default route comes from RA) I'm not seeing any outbound IPv6 traffic from my CentOS 7 box on the WAN interface. I do see RA's emitting from the LAN interface, from radvd. Is there

I had the following spat out by syslog on my (2.4.18-pre7-ac3) mailer / web server: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:611: "!(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Lock)) != 0)" One of its partitions froze hard--I've rebooted it, and I have an oops which the BUG() triggered which won't decode at the moment, but I'll sort that one out

...+ 532: 70 6f jo 5a3 <__FUNCTION__.22744+0xb> > 534: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx) > 535: 65 6e outsb %gs:(%esi),(%dx) > - 537: 74 5f je 598 <__FUNCTION__.22833> > - 539: 72 65 jb 5a0 <__FUNCTION__.22833+0x8> > + 537: 74 5f je 598 <__FUNCTION__.22744> > + 539: 72 65 jb 5a0 <__FUNCTION__.22744+0x8> > 53b: 66 data16 > - 53c: 73 5f jae 59d <__FUNCTION__.22833+0x5> &gt...

The saga continues. I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3 of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ: warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs (Are the above two ok?) The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in the

...68 CA 6D EF 00 13 18 89 F2 3B 1B 10 00 P..h.m.. ....;... [570] 15 2F 8D EA 88 B9 EC 6E FC 47 3E 2B D3 64 0D 52 ./.....n .G>+.d.R [580] 67 61 88 82 F6 30 C8 9A E8 3D BD 7F F5 3C 4B 2B ga...0.. .=...<K+ [590] 28 B6 63 E6 5C 73 2F 9C C3 AD 62 B1 E6 F2 EE 3E (.c.\s/. ..b....> [5A0] 39 18 80 E0 40 14 4E 11 DA F4 44 FC 84 14 74 69 9...@.N. ..D...ti [5B0] 39 72 F0 F2 F3 10 D6 98 D7 E4 92 47 56 9r...... ...GV [2009/04/16 08:03:11, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1334) timeout_processing: End of file from client (client has disconnected). Log from browsing...

...560] B4 18 F4 08 05 06 16 04 66 02 A6 02 78 02 98 02 ........ f...x... [570] 8A 02 08 0B 04 08 14 30 A6 19 D6 10 C7 00 E7 14 .......0 ........ [580] 18 30 7B 11 CB 00 1C 30 DC 10 08 0E F4 08 E5 07 .0{....0 ........ [590] 26 06 36 20 86 16 B6 11 D6 00 17 04 57 12 A7 01 &.6 .... ....W... [5A0] 39 10 5B 01 6B 00 3C 10 08 0C 04 10 06 00 36 06 9.[.k.<. ......6. [5B0] 46 20 96 16 C6 21 27 04 67 14 B7 01 F7 05 E8 04 F ...!'. g....... [5C0] 4C 20 08 0C 06 20 46 20 A6 30 27 15 67 15 97 10 L ... F .0'.g... [5D0] D7 14 A9 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ..........

..... [560] 63 C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD c...e... ........ [570] 00 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 28 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 .......( ..m....c [580] C0 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 ...e.... ........ [590] 03 03 FE 00 00 C1 29 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 ......). .m....c. [5A0] 01 F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 ..e..... ........ [5B0] 03 FE 00 00 C1 2A 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 .....*.. m....c.. [5C0] F8 65 B1 FB 0E 01 FF 80 82 00 82 00 CD 00 03 03 .e...... ........ [5D0] FE 00 00 C1 2B 00 F8 6D C1 01 00 F8 63 C0 01 F8 ....+..m ....c... [5E0] 65...

Hi Folks, I''ve got a 3.9 Tb zpool, and it is casing kernel panics on my Solaris 10 280r (SPARC) server. The message I get on panic is this: panic[cpu1]/thread=2a100a95cc0: zfs: freeing free segment (offset=423713792 size=1024) This seems to come about when the zpool is being used or being scrubbed - about twice a day at the moment. After the reboot, the scrub seems to have

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking