search for: 59s

Hi, I would like to run random Forest classification algorithm and check the accuracy of the prediction according to different training and testing schemes. For example, extracting 70% of the samples for training and the rest for testing, or using 10-fold cross validation scheme. How can I do that? Is there a function? Thanks a lot, Chrysanthi. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

..._reporting --name=fio-test fio-test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, iodepth=16 ... fio-2.16 Starting 16 processes fio-test: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB) Jobs: 14 (f=13): [m(5),_(1),m(8),f(1),_(1)] [33.9% done] [1000KB/440KB/0KB /s] [125/55/0 iops] [eta 01m:59s] fio-test: (groupid=0, jobs=16): err= 0: pid=2051: Tue Oct 10 16:51:46 2017 read : io=43392KB, bw=733103B/s, iops=89, runt= 60610msec slat (usec): min=14, max=1992.5K, avg=177873.67, stdev=382294.06 clat (usec): min=768, max=6016.8K, avg=1871390.57, stdev=1082220.06 lat (usec): min=8...

...-------------- | | UNTAR | DU | FIND | TAR | RM | --------------------------------------------------------------- | single | ~3m45s | ~43s | ~47s | ~3m10s | ~3m15s | --------------------------------------------------------------- | replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s | --------------------------------------------------------------- | distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s | --------------------------------------------------------------- | dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m40s | ------------...

...11:32+00:00; -3m05s from scanner time. 3269/tcp open ssl/ldap (Anonymous bind OK) | ssl-cert: Subject: commonName=AD.office.mydomain.com/organizationName=Samba Administration | Not valid before: 2017-07-04T17:24:08 |_Not valid after: 2019-06-04T17:24:08 |_ssl-date: 2017-07-08T15:13:38+00:00; -59s from scanner time. MAC Address: A0:36:9F:27:02:CD (Intel Corporate) Device type: general purpose Running: Linux 3.X|4.X OS CPE: cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel:3 cpe:/o:linux:linux_kernel:4 OS details: Linux 3.2 - 4.6 Network Distance: 1 hop Service Info: Host: AD; OSs: Linux, Windows; CPE: cpe:/o:linux:...

...| UNTAR | DU | FIND | TAR | RM | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | single | ~3m45s | ~43s | ~47s | ~3m10s | ~3m15s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | replicated | ~5m10s | ~59s | ~1m6s | ~1m19s | ~1m49s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | distributed | ~4m18s | ~41s | ~57s | ~2m24s | ~1m38s | > --------------------------------------------------------------- > | dist-repl | ~8m18s | ~1m4s | ~1m11s | ~1m24s | ~2m4...

...test: (g=0): rw=randrw, bs=8K-8K/8K-8K/8K-8K, ioengine=libaio, > iodepth=16 > ... > fio-2.16 > Starting 16 processes > fio-test: Laying out IO file(s) (1 file(s) / 256MB) > Jobs: 14 (f=13): [m(5),_(1),m(8),f(1),_(1)] [33.9% done] [1000KB/440KB/0KB > /s] [125/55/0 iops] [eta 01m:59s] > fio-test: (groupid=0, jobs=16): err= 0: pid=2051: Tue Oct 10 16:51:46 2017 > read : io=43392KB, bw=733103B/s, iops=89, runt= 60610msec > slat (usec): min=14, max=1992.5K, avg=177873.67, stdev=382294.06 > clat (usec): min=768, max=6016.8K, avg=1871390.57, stdev=1082220.06 &g...

...d nfslock, for good measure. service nfs-idmap status Redirecting to /bin/systemctl status nfs-idmap.service nfs-idmap.service - NFSv4 ID-name mapping daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-idmap.service; disabled) Active: active (running) since Thu 2015-04-23 11:23:24 EDT; 2min 59s ago Process: 14618 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd $RPCIDMAPDARGS (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 14620 (rpc.idmapd) CGroup: /system.slice/nfs-idmap.service `-14620 /usr/sbin/rpc.idmapd Apr 23 11:23:24 paris.cit.nih.gov systemd[1]: Starting NFSv4 ID-name mapping.... Apr 2...

I have been having periodic trouble with mpg123. I have tried .59r & .59s and perhaps others a while back and still get the 'broken pipe' and zombie mpg123s (although I think I saw something about a fix in the changelog) once and a while. Is it currently possible to configure moh to run directly on the wav files? Now-a-days hard drives are so big, why use compres...

...time sudo rm /mnt/zero ~1.5s sudo umount /mnt --- #default setting sudo mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb sudo mount /dev/sdb /mnt time sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/zero bs=1M count=4096 ~48.5s time sudo rm /mnt/zero ~1.5s sudo umount /mnt --- #raw write time sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=4096 ~59s I don''t see any different between mixed and defaults blocks. So using mixed blocks have sense? Or this is outdated function? Can i change in future type of chunk allocation between mixed and default (with using balance function)? i believe in mixed blocks because this function can awoid...

Dear all, One day when I tried to load an existing workspace (when opening R or by load()), R crashed without any error notification. The day before I had worked and saved my workspace without any trouble. At first I though it was a memory problem (workspace reaching 180Mo) or related to a particular script or command, so I start a new workspace. Everything was ok, that script and others

...530,000 tokens starting from scratch takes 24 minutes on the same box. Here's the ext3 part. On another machine I got the following times to build that list of 530,000 tokens, starting by creating empty db files on a partition mounted as: ext2: 3m 41s ext3, data=ordered: 27m 59s ext3, data=journal: 14m 11s ext3, data=writeback: 4m 2s I've discussed this with a senior bogofilter developer, Matthias Andree, who says, "tell them we have many scattered pwrites and one final fsync()." You can see graphs of what's going on on his website: 1. http://mandre...

...Santagada <santagada at gmail.com> wrote: > > I cleaned up my tests and figured that the obj file generated with > problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: > > lld-link: 4s > lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram > lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram > link: 13s > link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram > link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram > link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram > > link incremental: 8s when it works. > > > *specialpdb is created with passing to a set of compilation units (eg...

...Processed: 51 Uptime: 6h 47m 6s PID: 10853 Sessions: 1 Processed: 603 Uptime: 6h 43m 9s PID: 10620 Sessions: 1 Processed: 939 Uptime: 6h 45m 52s PID: 11438 Sessions: 1 Processed: 870 Uptime: 6h 30m 8s PID: 12582 Sessions: 1 Processed: 448 Uptime: 6h 9m 59s PID: 12670 Sessions: 1 Processed: 400 Uptime: 6h 8m 46s For comparison, most of our server processes recycle within 20 minutes normally, as they hit 1000 really fast. # you probably want to tune these settings PassengerHighPerformance on PassengerUseGlobalQueue on PassengerMaxPoolSize 2...

I cleaned up my tests and figured that the obj file generated with problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: lld-link: 4s lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram link: 13s link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram link incremental: 8s when it works. *specialpdb is created with passing to a set of compilation units (eg a folder) the same pdb to be written to,...

...> > wrote: > >> >> I cleaned up my tests and figured that the obj file generated with >> problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: >> >> lld-link: 4s >> lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram >> lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram >> link: 13s >> link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram >> link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram >> link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram >> >> link incremental: 8s when it works. >> >> >> *specialpdb is created with passi...

...t;> >>> I cleaned up my tests and figured that the obj file generated with >>> problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: >>> >>> lld-link: 4s >>> lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram >>> lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram >>> link: 13s >>> link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram >>> link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram >>> link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram >>> >>> link incremental: 8s when it works. >>> >>> >>&g...

...I cleaned up my tests and figured that the obj file generated with >>>> problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: >>>> >>>> lld-link: 4s >>>> lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram >>>> lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram >>>> link: 13s >>>> link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram >>>> link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram >>>> link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram >>>> >>>> link incremental: 8s when it works. >>>...

...s and figured that the obj file generated with >>>>> problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: >>>>> >>>>> lld-link: 4s >>>>> lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram >>>>> lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram >>>>> link: 13s >>>>> link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram >>>>> link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram >>>>> link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram >>>>> >>>>> link incremental: 8s whe...

I don’t have pgo numbers. When I build using -flto=thin the link time is significantly faster than msvc /ltcg and runtime is slightly faster, but I haven’t tested on a large variety of different workloads, so YMMV. Link time will definitely be faster though On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 2:20 PM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com> wrote: > This part is only for objects with /Z7 debug

...he obj file generated with >>>>>> problems was only with msvc 2015, so trying again with msvc 2017 I get: >>>>>> >>>>>> lld-link: 4s >>>>>> lld-link /debug: 1m30s and ~20gb of ram >>>>>> lld-link /debug:ghash: 59s and ~20gb of ram >>>>>> link: 13s >>>>>> link /debug:fastlink: 43s and 1gb of ram >>>>>> link specialpdb: 1m10s and 4gb of ram >>>>>> link /debug: 9m16s min and >14gb of ram >>>>>> >>>>>>...