Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "5982ebb7".
Did you mean:
578ebb7
2017 Apr 19
3
[RFC] Adding CPS call support
> The semantics around inlining alone are problematic enough to warrant serious hesitation.
There are nicer ways to embed CPS call/return into LLVM; I just figured that there would not be much support for adding a new terminator because it would change a lot of code. Ideally we would have a block terminator like:
cps call ghccc @bar (.. args ..) returnsto label %retpt
Where the