Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "59,18".
Did you mean:
594,18
2016 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...gt; -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +#define __smp_mb() mb()
> +#define __smp_rmb() __lwsync()
> +#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
>
> /*
> * This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
> @@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
> #define data_barrier(x) \
> asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
>
> -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> +#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
> do { \
> compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);...
2016 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...gt; -#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +#define __smp_mb() mb()
> +#define __smp_rmb() __lwsync()
> +#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
>
> /*
> * This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
> @@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
> #define data_barrier(x) \
> asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
>
> -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> +#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
> do { \
> compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p);...
2016 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...gt; > > +#define __smp_rmb() __lwsync()
> > > +#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
> > > @@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
> > > #define data_barrier(x) \
> > > asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
> > >
> > > -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > > +#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > > d...
2016 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...gt; > > +#define __smp_rmb() __lwsync()
> > > +#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
> > > @@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
> > > #define data_barrier(x) \
> > > asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
> > >
> > > -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > > +#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > > d...
2015 Dec 31
0
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...barrier()
-#define smp_wmb() barrier()
-#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+#define __smp_mb() mb()
+#define __smp_rmb() __lwsync()
+#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
/*
* This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
@@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
#define data_barrier(x) \
asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
-#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
+#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
do { \
compiletime_assert_atomic_type(*p); \
- smp_lwsync(); \
+ __smp_l...
2016 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...gt; +#define __smp_mb() mb()
> > +#define __smp_rmb() __lwsync()
> > +#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
> >
> > /*
> > * This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
> > @@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
> > #define data_barrier(x) \
> > asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
> >
> > -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > +#define __smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > do { \
> > comp...
2013 Jan 31
1
[PATCH] tcm_vhost: Multi-target support
...+++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h | 4 +-
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
index 218deb6..d50cb95 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
@@ -59,13 +59,18 @@ enum {
VHOST_SCSI_VQ_IO = 2,
};
+#define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET 256
+
struct vhost_scsi {
- struct tcm_vhost_tpg *vs_tpg; /* Protected by vhost_scsi->dev.mutex */
+ /* Protected by vhost_scsi->dev.mutex */
+ struct tcm_vhost_tpg *vs_tpg[VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET];
struct vhost...
2013 Jan 31
1
[PATCH] tcm_vhost: Multi-target support
...+++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.h | 4 +-
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
index 218deb6..d50cb95 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c
@@ -59,13 +59,18 @@ enum {
VHOST_SCSI_VQ_IO = 2,
};
+#define VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET 256
+
struct vhost_scsi {
- struct tcm_vhost_tpg *vs_tpg; /* Protected by vhost_scsi->dev.mutex */
+ /* Protected by vhost_scsi->dev.mutex */
+ struct tcm_vhost_tpg *vs_tpg[VHOST_SCSI_MAX_TARGET];
struct vhost...
2016 Jan 05
0
[PATCH v2 15/32] powerpc: define __smp_xxx
...smp_rmb() __lwsync()
> > > > +#define __smp_wmb() __asm__ __volatile__ (stringify_in_c(SMPWMB) : : :"memory")
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * This is a barrier which prevents following instructions from being
> > > > @@ -67,18 +59,18 @@
> > > > #define data_barrier(x) \
> > > > asm volatile("twi 0,%0,0; isync" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
> > > >
> > > > -#define smp_store_release(p, v) \
> > > > +#define __smp_store_release(p, v)...
2014 Apr 13
2
Adding an external library to Xapian
...LL_POS << ALLSENSES << endl;
+ // char *syns = findtheinfo(argv[2], ALL_POS, 23, ALLSENSES);
+ // cout << syns << endl;
// Open the database for searching.
Xapian::Database db(argv[1]);
+
// Start an enquire session.
Xapian::Enquire enquire(db);
@@ -59,18 +67,29 @@
string query_string(argv[2]);
argv += 3;
while (*argv && strcmp(*argv, "--") != 0) {
- query_string += ' ';
- query_string += *argv++;
+ query_string += ' ';
+ query_string += *argv++;
}
// Create an RSet with the listed do...
2014 Apr 13
2
Adding an external library to Xapian
My code is not on Github. I am using the tarball as of now. The following
it the error that occurred:
http://pastebin.com/cVJrjUZX
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 8:16 PM, James Aylett <james-xapian at tartarus.org>wrote:
> On 13 Apr 2014, at 15:37, Pallavi Gudipati <pallavigudipati at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > A linker error is encountered even after following the above
2018 Jan 19
2
[nbdkit PATCH] Update filters to support FUA flags.
...ex af79e33..c8b3c8c 100644
--- a/include/nbdkit-filter.h
+++ b/include/nbdkit-filter.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* nbdkit
- * Copyright (C) 2013-2017 Red Hat Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2013-2018 Red Hat Inc.
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
@@ -59,17 +59,18 @@ struct nbdkit_next_ops {
int (*is_rotational) (void *nxdata);
int (*can_trim) (void *nxdata);
- int (*pread) (void *nxdata, void *buf, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset);
- int (*pwrite) (void *nxdata,
- const void *buf, uint32_t count, uint64_t offset);
- int (...
2011 Oct 27
1
[PATCH v3] virtio: Add platform bus driver for memory mapped virtio device
...it goes (below). Also do you think you would be able to merge the
driver (corresponding v4 patch follows) in the 3.2 merge window that
seems to have just opened? ;-)
Cheers!
Pawel
--- virtio-mmio.orig 2011-10-24 11:17:08.263907000 +0100
+++ virtio-mmio.tex 2011-10-24 13:58:29.752757000 +0100
@@ -59,9 +59,18 @@
\item 0x050 | W | QueueNotify \\
Queue notifier.\\
Writing a queue index to this register notifies the Host that there are new buffers to process in the queue.
-\item 0x060 | W | InterruptACK \\
+\item 0x060 | R | InterruptStatus \\
+Interrupt status. \\
+Reading from this register r...
2011 Oct 27
1
[PATCH v3] virtio: Add platform bus driver for memory mapped virtio device
...it goes (below). Also do you think you would be able to merge the
driver (corresponding v4 patch follows) in the 3.2 merge window that
seems to have just opened? ;-)
Cheers!
Pawel
--- virtio-mmio.orig 2011-10-24 11:17:08.263907000 +0100
+++ virtio-mmio.tex 2011-10-24 13:58:29.752757000 +0100
@@ -59,9 +59,18 @@
\item 0x050 | W | QueueNotify \\
Queue notifier.\\
Writing a queue index to this register notifies the Host that there are new buffers to process in the queue.
-\item 0x060 | W | InterruptACK \\
+\item 0x060 | R | InterruptStatus \\
+Interrupt status. \\
+Reading from this register r...
2012 Jun 12
9
[PATCH v2 0/9]
More comprehensive support for virtio-scsi. Passes all the tests.
Rich.
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1:
- replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip
- add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation,
as suggested by David Miller
- dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant
mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes
too long then)
I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1:
- replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip
- add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation,
as suggested by David Miller
- dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant
mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes
too long then)
I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2007 Jun 18
0
Branch 'as' - 8 commits - libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c libswfdec/swfdec_sprite.c libswfdec/swfdec_sprite.h libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie.c libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie.h libswfdec/swfdec_swf_decoder.c libswfdec/swfdec_swf_decoder.h
...aphic;
- if (cur != NULL) {
+ if (cur != NULL && version > 5) {
SWFDEC_INFO ("depth %d is already occupied by movie %s, not placing", depth, cur->name);
return TRUE;
}
diff-tree 050e05430d2e69be906db321a16eeaf26513b17d (from 0ca7a97fe2449e4fc4c63789ee59dafb07cf5175)
Author: Benjamin Otte <otte at gnome.org>
Date: Mon Jun 18 23:43:55 2007 +0200
abort on a place if the place has no character
diff --git a/libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie.c b/libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie.c
index 139e01d..e6430a3 100644
--- a/libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie.c...
2019 Feb 10
21
[PATCH 00/13] Patch blast of salsa wip.testme branch
The contents are the wip.testme branch currently on salsa. I combined
the wip.initscript and wip.oxenstored into this and added more things
today. I think this is pretty gtg and it's smoke tested (in several
cases by scping files around instead of doing package build), so it
needs a final extra review and test round before putting it in master
branch (which I don't want to force push).
I
2015 Dec 30
46
[PATCH 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + __smp_XXX barriers for virt
This is really trying to cleanup some virt code, as suggested by Peter, who
said
> You could of course go fix that instead of mutilating things into
> sort-of functional state.
This work is needed for virtio, so it's probably easiest to
merge it through my tree - is this fine by everyone?
Arnd, if you agree, could you ack this please?
Note to arch maintainers: please don't