Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "58f029fbe9fc".
2015 Aug 01
3
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
The diff is not only the && and || but also the leading !:
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
index 58f029fbe9fc..7ee06fc153b2 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {
(void)BlockNumber;
bool MatchFilterBB = false; (void)MatchFilterBB;
#ifndef NDEBUG
- MatchFilterBB =...
2015 Aug 11
2
Fwd: [LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
...2015 2:43 PM, "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com<mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote:
The diff is not only the && and || but also the leading !:
diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
index 58f029fbe9fc..7ee06fc153b2 100644
--- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
+++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::CodeGenAndEmitDAG() {
(void)BlockNumber;
bool MatchFilterBB = false; (void)MatchFilterBB;
#ifndef NDEBUG
- MatchFilterBB =...
2015 Jul 27
1
[LLVMdev] SelectionDAG viewers, filter-view-dags question
Daniel,
Ok, thanks. Simple fix. We'll just make correction in local copy for now,
one less thing to port later :)
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>
wrote:
> I've just looked at my checkout of 3.6 and it looks like the fix wasn't
> merged. I don't have the revision number for the fix to hand but in
>