Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "589845".
Did you mean:
58984
2011 Dec 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 metadata
...; [ DW_TAG_file_type ]
!2 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"foodbg.c",
metadata !"/home/deldon/tmp", metadata !"clang version 2.9
(tags/RELEASE_29/final)", i1 true, i1 false, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [
DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
!3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1,
i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ;
[ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
!4 = metadata !{null}
...
As you can see metadata definition !0 doesn't match documentation.
What is the correct definition (CLANG or LLVM docume...
2011 Dec 07
2
[LLVMdev] Generating DWARF information that pretends an outparam is the return value
...metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !2, metadata !"foo", metadata !"foo", metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 2, metadata !3, i1 false, i1 true, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i1 f\
> alse, i32 ()* @foo, null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ]
>
> !3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !2, metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
!4 = metadata !{metadata !8}
>
>
> !8 = metadata !{i32 589860, metadata !0, metadata !"char", null, i32 0, i64...
2011 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Generating DWARF information that pretends an outparam is the return value
...foo'.
!1 = metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !2, metadata !"foo", metadata !"foo", metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 2, metadata !3, i1 false, i1 true, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i1 f\
alse, i32 ()* @foo, null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ]
!3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !2, metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
!8 = metadata !{i32 589860, metadata !0, metadata !"char", null, i32 0, i64 8, i64 8, i64 0, i32 0, i32 6} ; [ DW_TAG_base_...
2011 Dec 05
2
[LLVMdev] Generating DWARF information that pretends an outparam is the return value
The Rust compiler defines all functions as returning void, with the
first parameter being an outparam of the declared return type, ie.
fn foo2() -> int { ret 5; }
becomes
define void @_ZN4foo217_5cb557d30658848cE(i64*, { i64, { %tydesc*, i1,
{} } }*) uwtable {
store i64 5, i64* %0
ret void
}
I'm working on generating debug information for Rust, and I'm
currently stumped on how
2011 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 metadata
..._type ]
> !2 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"foodbg.c", metadata !"/home/deldon/tmp", metadata !"clang version 2.9 (tags/RELEASE_29/final)", i1 true, i1 false, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
>
> !3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
> !4 = metadata !{null}
> ...
>
> As you can see metadata definition !0 doesn't match documentation. What is the correct definition (...
2011 Dec 07
0
[LLVMdev] Generating DWARF information that pretends an outparam is the return value
...!{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !2, metadata !"foo", metadata
> !"foo", metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 2, metadata !3, i1 false, i1 true,
> i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, i1 f\
> alse, i32 ()* @foo, null, null} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ]
>
> !3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !2, metadata !"", metadata !2, i32 0,
> i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [
> DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
>
>
>
> !4 = metadata !{metadata !8}
>
>
>
> !8 = metadata !{i32 589860, metadata !0, metadata !"char", nu...
2011 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM 2.9 metadata
...e_type ]
> !2 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"foodbg.c", metadata !"/home/deldon/tmp", metadata !"clang version 2.9 (tags/RELEASE_29/final)", i1 true, i1 false, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
>
> !3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
> !4 = metadata !{null}
> ...
>
> As you can see metadata definition !0 doesn't match documentation. What is the correct definition (C...
2011 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] Missing metadata for volatile variables
.../post/tests/test1", metadata !2}
; [ DW_TAG_file_type ]
!2 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 1, metadata !"source.c",
metadata !"post/tests/test1", metadata !"4.5.2", i1 true, i1 false,
metadata !"", i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
!3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1,
i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, null, metadata !4, i32 0, null} ; [
DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
!4 = metadata !{metadata !5}
!5 = metadata !{i32 589860, metadata !1, metadata !"int", metadata !1,
i32 0, i64 32, i64 32, i64 0, i32 0, i32 5...
2012 Jan 16
2
[LLVMdev] Need more information on llvm.dbg.value call
...e_type ]
!2 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"localvar.c", metadata
!"/home/deldon/Work/OpenCL/DEBUG", metadata !"clang version 2.9
(tags/RELEASE_29/final)", i1 true, i1 true, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [
DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
!3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 0,
i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [
DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
!4 = metadata !{null}
!5 = metadata !{i32 590081, metadata !0, metadata !"y", metadata !1, i32
16777220, metadata !6, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_arg_...
2012 Mar 02
2
[LLVMdev] Question on debug information
...tadata !"check.c", metadata
!".", metadata !" Seb Rel Dev-r02.27", i1 1, i1 0, metadata !"", i32 0} ;
DW_TAG_compile_unit
!1 = metadata !{i32 589865, metadata !"check.c", metadata !".", metadata
!0} ; DW_TAG_file_type
!2 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 0,
i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, null, i32 0, i32 0} ;
DW_TAG_subroutine_type
!3 = metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !"check",
metadata !"check", metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 7, metadata !...
2012 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] Question on debug information
...t;, metadata
> !".", metadata !" Seb Rel Dev-r02.27", i1 1, i1 0, metadata !"", i32 0} ;
> DW_TAG_compile_unit
> !1 = metadata !{i32 589865, metadata !"check.c", metadata !".", metadata
> !0} ; DW_TAG_file_type
> !2 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32
> 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, null, i32 0, i32 0} ;
> DW_TAG_subroutine_type
> !3 = metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !"check",
> metadata !"check", metadata !"", metadata !...
2012 Feb 28
0
[LLVMdev] inspecting value of formal parameter in gdb for x86
...le_type ]
!2 = metadata !{i32 589841, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"argpass.c", metadata
!"/home/deldon/Work/OpenCL/DEBUG", metadata !"clang version 2.9
(tags/RELEASE_29/final)", i1 true, i1 true, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [
DW_TAG_compile_unit ]
!3 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 0,
i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, metadata !4, i32 0, i32 0} ; [
DW_TAG_subroutine_type ]
!4 = metadata !{null}
!5 = metadata !{i32 590081, metadata !0, metadata !"c", metadata !1, i32
16777221, metadata !6, i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_arg_...
2012 Mar 06
2
[LLVMdev] Question on debug information
...uot;check.c", metadata !".", metadata !" Seb Rel Dev-r02.27", i1 1, i1 0, metadata !"", i32 0} ; DW_TAG_compile_unit
> !1 = metadata !{i32 589865, metadata !"check.c", metadata !".", metadata !0} ; DW_TAG_file_type
> !2 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, null, i32 0, i32 0} ; DW_TAG_subroutine_type
> !3 = metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !"check", metadata !"check", metadata !"", metadata !1, i32 7, metad...
2012 Mar 07
0
[LLVMdev] Question on debug information
...; !".", metadata !" Seb Rel Dev-r02.27", i1 1, i1 0, metadata !"", i32 0} ;
>> DW_TAG_compile_unit
>> !1 = metadata !{i32 589865, metadata !"check.c", metadata !".", metadata
>> !0} ; DW_TAG_file_type
>> !2 = metadata !{i32 589845, metadata !1, metadata !"", metadata !1, i32
>> 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0, null, i32 0, i32 0} ;
>> DW_TAG_subroutine_type
>> !3 = metadata !{i32 589870, i32 0, metadata !1, metadata !"check",
>> metadata !"check", metadata !"&q...