search for: 588d9e41

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "588d9e41".

2015 Nov 02
2
[cfe-dev] [RFC][libcxx] Fix and maintain the no-exceptions build of libcxx
> I find it amusing that you think that there's a "correct behavior" when the standard specifies > that an operation should throw an exception and you have disabled exceptions. You got me there! I think it's OK to be consistent across all the places and call abort(), this is what I've been doing in my current patch. I will double check this behavior with other