Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "5856b".
Did you mean:
5856
2013 Jul 23
2
[LLVMdev] Question on optimizeThumb2JumpTables
...is met.
However, in the next example, it fails:
5808B BB#30: derived from LLVM BB %105
Live Ins: %R4 %R6 %D8 %Q5 %R9 %R7 %R8 %R10 %R5 %R11
Predecessors according to CFG: BB#29
5840B %R3<def> = t2LEApcrelJT <jt#1>, 1, pred:14, pred:%noreg
5856B %R2<def> = t2ADDrs %R3<kill>, %R7, 18, pred:14, pred:%noreg,
opt:%noreg
5872B t2BR_JT %R2<kill>, %R7<kill>, <jt#1>, 1
Successors according to CFG: BB#90(17) BB#31(17) BB#32(17)
BB#33(17) BB#34(17) BB#51(17)
Here we see that the Bas...
2013 Jul 29
0
[LLVMdev] Question on optimizeThumb2JumpTables
...5808B BB#30: derived from LLVM BB %105****
>
> Live Ins: %R4 %R6 %D8 %Q5 %R9 %R7 %R8 %R10 %R5 %R11****
>
> Predecessors according to CFG: BB#29****
>
> 5840B %R3<def> = t2LEApcrelJT <jt#1>, 1, pred:14, pred:%noreg***
> *
>
> 5856B %R2<def> = t2ADDrs %R3<kill>, %R7, 18, pred:14,
> pred:%noreg, opt:%noreg****
>
> 5872B t2BR_JT %R2<kill>, %R7<kill>, <jt#1>, 1****
>
> Successors according to CFG: BB#90(17) BB#31(17) BB#32(17)
> BB#33(17) BB#34(17) BB...
2013 Jul 29
1
[LLVMdev] Question on optimizeThumb2JumpTables
...>
>
> 5808B BB#30: derived from LLVM BB %105
>
> Live Ins: %R4 %R6 %D8 %Q5 %R9 %R7 %R8 %R10 %R5 %R11
>
> Predecessors according to CFG: BB#29
>
> 5840B %R3<def> = t2LEApcrelJT <jt#1>, 1, pred:14, pred:%noreg
>
> 5856B %R2<def> = t2ADDrs %R3<kill>, %R7, 18, pred:14, pred:%noreg, opt:%noreg
>
> 5872B t2BR_JT %R2<kill>, %R7<kill>, <jt#1>, 1
>
> Successors according to CFG: BB#90(17) BB#31(17) BB#32(17) BB#33(17) BB#34(17) BB#51(17)
>
&g...