search for: 57e9

...here LLVM could help. LLVM optimized code for those scripts should run faster than our manual implementation. So the overall performance could be improved. Could you please point out if we are wrong? Thanks. -- Best wishes, Mu Qiao GnuPG fingerprint: 92B1 B0C4 8D14 F8C4 EFA5 3ACC 30B3 0DE4 17B1 57E9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 554 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110324/2672b318/attachment.sig>

Mu Qiao wrote: > Hi devs, > > We are implementing a library that interprets shell scripts so that > other programs could efficiently talk to bash. We'd like to hear your > advice on whether LLVM is appropriate for us. Here are our considerations: > > In most cases our library will interpret each script just once. Our > current approach is using a manual