Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "57861a51".
2012 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
...;m not saying we can't get there, I think we can, but I think it may be
somewhat more annoying than you might imagine to get there in the short
term.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120711/57861a51/attachment.html>
2012 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote:
> And one more question regarding ASan cmake build.
> Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is
> not:
>
As a side note: I don't like that the current cmake machinery builds asan
tests by explicitly passing libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a.
IMO it needs to use
2012 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question
And one more question regarding ASan cmake build.
Currently unittests are fine, but regular "clang -faddress-sanitizer" is
not:
current cmake build stores libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a together with all the
LLVM libs
(in $build_path/lib/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.a), but the Clang driver looks
for asan runtime
in clang resource dir: