search for: 5772b4b3

> That was what I had in mind: the function attribute blocks tail call for statically direct calls but doesn't promise > anything (in fact, does nothing) for indirect calls. > > Do you think we shouldn't make any promises for statically direct calls either? I don't see why it's hard to keep the > promise that direct tail calls will be blocked. Do you have a

...39;ed. That might be an interesting idea to other people, but it's not something that is needed for our use case. > -- Sanjoy >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150929/5772b4b3/attachment.html>