Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "57294d83".
2013 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] Float undef value propagation
...int values which
cannot be the result of undef + non-NaN for many values of non-NaN, so the
result of undef + non-Nan is not an unconstrained undef.
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131214/57294d83/attachment.html>
2013 Dec 13
2
[LLVMdev] Float undef value propagation
On Dec 12, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:
> undef + any == NaN (since undef can be NaN) or undef + any (since undef could be zero)
undef + non-NaN is still undef. The compiler is free to choose any value of the type it wishes when simplifying an undef expression. The important point is that it still has to be a value of that type. Hence,