Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "57202".
Did you mean:
5720
2007 Jul 20
0
CESA-2007:0723 Moderate CentOS 4 ia64 thunderbird - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0723
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0723.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors:
ia64:
updates/ia64/RPMS/thunderbird-1.5.0.12-0.3.el4.centos4.ia64.rpm
--
Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/
Top-postings silently ignored
-------------- next part --------------
A
2009 Apr 03
1
Memory Leak with stock Squirrelmail, PHP, mysql, apache since 5.3
...at webmail kernel:DMA32 per-cpu: empty
Apr 2 18:05:47 s_local at webmail kernel:Normal per-cpu: empty
Apr 2 18:05:47 s_local at webmail kernel:HighMem per-cpu: empty
Apr 2 18:05:47 s_local at webmail kernel:Free pages: 2868kB (0kB
HighMem)
Apr 2 18:05:47 s_local at webmail kernel:Active:57202 inactive:56889
dirty:0 writeback:0 unstable:0 free:717 slab:4124 mapped-file:2
mapped-anon:114137 pagetables:3184
Apr 2 18:05:47 s_local at webmail kernel:DMA free:2868kB min:2916kB
low:3644kB high:4372kB active:228808kB inactive:227556kB
present:532480kB pages_scanned:708700 all_unreclaimable...
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
....01 6771 0 0.01 6771
XzDec.ll 22 116114 0 0.02 116098 0 0.02 116098
XzEnc.ll 14 42487 0 0.01 42471 0 0.02 42471
XzHandler.ll 68 314940 3 0.03 315018 0 0.03 313654
XzIn.ll 9 45789 0 0.01 45773 0 0.01 45773
Xz.ll 7 10667 0 0.01 10651 0 0.01 10651
ygraph.ll 1 83322 0 0.02 83289 0 0.01 83289
y.tab.ll 2 57202 0 0.01 57281 0 0.02 57281
z01.ll 4 249374 0 0.03 249340 0 0.03 249340
z02.ll 10 358729 0 0.03 358695 0 0.03 358695
z03.ll 26 255270 0 0.03 255236 0 0.03 255236
z04.ll 3 31114 0 0.01 31080 0 0.01 31080
z05.ll 6 789376 0 0.07 789342 0 0.07 789342
z06.ll 8 1511562 0 0.12 1511528 0 0.12 1511528
z07.ll...