search for: 56z

Hi everybody, I'm a beginner in R and I'm having a hard time grouping my data by day. The data are in this format: id; words 2005-07-07T09:59:56Z; 35 2005-07-07T10:01:39Z; 13 2005-07-08T10:02:22Z; 1 2005-07-09T10:03:16Z; 23 2005-07-10T10:04:23Z; 39 2005-07-10T10:04:39Z; 15 I've transformed the date strings in dates with the function: london$id <- transform(london$id, as.Date(london$id, format="%Y-%m-%d%T%H:%M:%S%Z")) and it...

...ectClass: posixAccount cn: kosh$ sn: kosh$ uid: kosh$ uidNumber: 1003 gidNumber: 553 homeDirectory: /dev/null loginShell: /bin/false description: Computer structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson entryUUID: ab713f8a-71fc-1028-86cf-ec068f83861c creatorsName: cn=admin,dc=xpto createTimestamp: 20040724203456Z entryCSN: 2004072420:34:56Z#0x0001#0#0000 modifiersName: cn=admin,dc=xpto modifyTimestamp: 20040724203456Z Is there some permission issue (maybe in the slapd.conf file)? Can anybody help me? Thanks -- Paulo Silva <pjs@eurotux.com> Eurotux, SA -------------- next part -------------- A non-t...

I've solved the problem of the detached Eaton_SDK branch. What must have happened here is the branch creator did a non-Subversion cp -r followed by an add of the target directory. This registered a tree that duplicated trunk, *without* ancestry information connecting it to its source revision. The correct fix is to check each new text section against a list of MD5 hashes of old text

...f seconds or more to crash. --- I have tried: DRM with last check-in on 20080522T23:39:54Z X driver with last c-i on 20080522T19:08:48Z (Debian packages currently available at http://www.m4r3k.org/storage/nouveau/nouveau/2008-05-25/ ) and two older versions, the oldest one was DRM 20080117T23:51:56Z X 20080118T16:50Z The first video didn?t crash with it, there was just no picture. (haven?t tried older than that) The driver in Xfmedia was set to ?xv?, but with the latest driver I have also tried ?xshm? and ?none?. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email...

...ber: 10000 description: Depart1_Admins sambaSID: S-1-5-21-3642312925-2943760701-1776766777-512 sambaGroupType: 2 displayName: Depart1_Admins structuralObjectClass: posixGroup entryUUID: d0cf8466-f18d-1027-8b18-d75e5ed076c6 creatorsName: cn=Manager,dc=xxx,dc=it createTimestamp: 20040212095856Z entryCSN: 2004021209:58:56Z#0x0001#0#0000 modifiersName: cn=Manager,dc=xxx,dc=it modifyTimestamp: 20040212095856Z dn: uid=root-depart1,ou=depart1,ou=People,dc=xxx,dc=it objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: shadowAccount objectClass: sambaSamAccount objectClass: inetOrgPerson gecos: Samba Admin h...

(Moving from offlist discussion.) I''m interested in opinions... Assume there are four single vcpu domains A, B, C, D, running on a 2-CPU physical machine. We wish to test for time skew on domain A. Assuming B, C, and D are all running some workload that attempts to fully saturate the (single) cpu. 1) Should the affect on domain A be essentially the same regardless of what load