search for: 5694186

...ut I think that a > global reverse() adapter is the way to go. Likewise, we should have a > standard "enumerate()" adaptor like python. I definitely prefer the global adaptor pattern. As for prior art, I had played with it a bit, and came up with https://gist.github.com/compnerd/5694186 a while back. > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > cfe-dev mailing list > cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-dev > -- Saleem Abdulrasool compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org -------------- next part -------------- An HT...

...but I think that a global reverse() adapter is the way to go. Likewise, we should have a standard "enumerate()" adaptor like python. > > I definitely prefer the global adaptor pattern. As for prior art, I had played with it a bit, and came up with https://gist.github.com/compnerd/5694186 a while back. > > Yea, there is a pretty strong move toward range adaptors. If possible, I'm going to work on contributing a basic selection of them to LLVM's ADT specifically to address the immediate needs of range-based for loops. Sounds good. We also have to decide what to do wi...

...ink that a global reverse() adapter is the way to go. Likewise, we should have a standard "enumerate()" adaptor like python. >> >> I definitely prefer the global adaptor pattern. As for prior art, I had played with it a bit, and came up with https://gist.github.com/compnerd/5694186 a while back. >> >> Yea, there is a pretty strong move toward range adaptors. If possible, I'm going to work on contributing a basic selection of them to LLVM's ADT specifically to address the immediate needs of range-based for loops. > > Sounds good. We also have to de...

...but I think that a global reverse() adapter is the way to go. Likewise, we should have a standard "enumerate()" adaptor like python. > > I definitely prefer the global adaptor pattern. As for prior art, I had played with it a bit, and came up with https://gist.github.com/compnerd/5694186 a while back. > > Yea, there is a pretty strong move toward range adaptors. If possible, I'm going to work on contributing a basic selection of them to LLVM's ADT specifically to address the immediate needs of range-based for loops. There’s a decent selection of range adaptors in Bo...

On 3 March 2014 12:32, Pete Cooper <peter_cooper at apple.com> wrote: > Would those work with a foreach construct? Perhaps I forgot to mention that was what I'm trying to work out here. > > In example 3 I was wondering if we could define a method reverse(). We could use sfinae to wrap that around rbegin/rend if people like that style? Sorry, I was too terse... ;) If MF is a