Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "56916".
Did you mean:
569,6
2013 Aug 17
0
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon.
>>>
>>
> I
2007 Oct 03
0
CESA-2007:0323 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 xen Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0323 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0323.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
513cbea0fee3d2e0b2c7731c081b4cdc xen-3.0.3-25.0.4.el5.x86_64.rpm
0dcb7c88433bfa0a0bf8560c50ab60e6 xen-devel-3.0.3-25.0.4.el5.i386.rpm
2013 Aug 17
1
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
...;
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon
>>>>
>>>
> That has uncovered a slew of errors not caught with gcc 4.4.5 or
>> clang 3.3.
>>
>
Attached is a list of the gcc-4.8.1 warnings from a trunk rev 56916 build
(made into errors) that, for some reason, don't show in a debug build
(looks like compile flags may be different but I'm not sure at the
moment--need to dig into BRL-CAD CMake environment some more).
They look like legit problems but I haven't tried to fix them.
Best,
-Tom
----...
2013 Aug 17
2
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
> I'll see if I can try it with gcc 4.7 soon.
>>
>
I haven't been able to build gcc 4.7.3 yet (prereq ppl build problems--I
think that's why I stopped building gcc some time