Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "56106".
Did you mean:
5106
2020 Sep 24
2
Can't connect after AuthN: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
...Makes zero sense to me. I have a very similar set
up in another CentOS 8 box that works flawlessly as every other
installation I've done in 20 years.
[Snipped lines above that show successful AuthN, forced mapping to "Domain
Users", etc. all correct]
colive-12867 (ipv4:172.16.112.1:56106) connect to service IPC$ initially
as user chris (uid=1000, gid=1000) (pid 98051)
[2020/09/23 19:03:37.024156, 3]
../../source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:751(api_pipe_bind_req)
api_pipe_bind_req: lsarpc -> lsarpc rpc service
[2020/09/23 19:03:37.024174, 3]
../../source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:356...
2020 Sep 24
0
Can't connect after AuthN: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
...a very similar set
> up in another CentOS 8 box that works flawlessly as every other
> installation I've done in 20 years.
>
> [Snipped lines above that show successful AuthN, forced mapping to "Domain
> Users", etc. all correct]
> colive-12867 (ipv4:172.16.112.1:56106) connect to service IPC$ initially
> as user chris (uid=1000, gid=1000) (pid 98051)
> [2020/09/23 19:03:37.024156, 3]
> ../../source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:751(api_pipe_bind_req)
> api_pipe_bind_req: lsarpc -> lsarpc rpc service
> [2020/09/23 19:03:37.024174, 3]
> ../../so...
2020 Sep 24
1
Can't connect after AuthN: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
...another CentOS 8 box that works flawlessly as every other
> > installation I've done in 20 years.
> >
> > [Snipped lines above that show successful AuthN, forced mapping to
> "Domain
> > Users", etc. all correct]
> > colive-12867 (ipv4:172.16.112.1:56106) connect to service IPC$
> initially
> > as user chris (uid=1000, gid=1000) (pid 98051)
> > [2020/09/23 19:03:37.024156, 3]
> > ../../source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:751(api_pipe_bind_req)
> > api_pipe_bind_req: lsarpc -> lsarpc rpc service
> > [2020/09/23 19:0...
2005 Aug 03
0
[Fwd: Re: [wx-dev] Followup on "wxWindows Library Licence, Version 3.1"]
Good news regarding the wx licensing concern that came up here a couple
weeks ago.
See also: http://wxwidgets.org/newlicen.htm
Kevin
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [wx-dev] Followup on "wxWindows Library Licence, Version 3.1"
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 21:44:34 +0100
From: Julian Smart
To: wx-dev@lists.wxwidgets.org
CC: Kevin Smith <wxruby@qualitycode.com>
Hi,