search for: 55d360e9

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay > around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent > enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features > from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't

...toconf. I hate it, and it needs to die. Chip P.S. -- Chandler, please increase the font size in your mail client. It's very small and hard to read. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120621/55d360e9/attachment.html>

Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it! Nick -------------- next part