search for: 55555555

It seems division with numbers bigger than 10 000 000 doesn't work 20000000/21 [1] 952381 > 55555555/23 [1] 2415459 Thank you

...IVR plays and then attempts to perform a "transfer" to a third party, and once the outbound call is connected both legs are bridged. I've seen some dialplans out there that use the normal Dial application. in my dialplan i've used various different methods: exten => s,5,Dial(55555555) exten => s,5,Dial(vpb/55555555) exten => s,5,Dial(vpb/1-3/55555555) (the third one is assuming it means board 1 line 3) in the log file, the following error is recorded each time the outbound dial is attempted: "File app_dial.c, Line 499 (dial_exec): Unable to create channel of type...

...ten => 11,1,Dial(SIP/gsbt100,20,tr);calling <11>: dial our office phone include => invalid_calls ;all ext numbers not handled above are invalid [voiptalk.org] ;forwards any calls starting with an "8" thru voiptalk.org exten => _8.,1,Answer exten => _8.,3,SetCIDNum(55555555) exten => _8.,4,SetCIDName(My Name And Surname) exten => _8.,5,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1}@voiptalk.org,,g) exten => _8.,6,HangUp [invalid_calls] ;;; default context for invalid calls exten => _.,1,Wait(1) exten => _.,2,Answer exten => _.,3,Playback(invalid) exten => _.,4,Hangu...

Why is it that newcomers always feel like inserting 'Answer' is a necessary step in their extension.conf entries? >[voiptalk.org] >;forwards any calls starting with an "8" thru voiptalk.org >exten => _8.,1,Answer >exten => _8.,3,SetCIDNum(55555555) >exten => _8.,4,SetCIDName(My Name And Surname) >exten => _8.,5,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1}@voiptalk.org,,g) >exten => _8.,6,HangUp I fully understand that incoming pstn calls have to be answered (in most cases) before executing a Playback(invalid) type statement. But there must be some...

I''ve just had my first attempt at getting VGA passthrough to work, and it crashed the machine. I''m trying to understand whether this is a problem with my hardware, configuration or a software problem. I''m running Xen 4.1.2 with Linux 3.1.2 The CPU is an Intel Core i5-650 http://ark.intel.com/products/43546/Intel-Core-i5-650-Processor-%284M-Cache-3_20-GHz%29 The Video

...from the log file on existing dc2, trying to replicate to newdc) > Jan 28 14:19:37 dc2 samba[3153]: [2020/01/28 14:19:37.115584, 0] > ../../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:737(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) > Jan 28 14:19:37 dc2 samba[3153]: Failed to bind to uuid > 11111111-2222-3333-4444-5555555555 for > ncacn_ip_tcp:192.168.1.6[49153,seal,krb5,target_hostname=66666666-7777-8888-9999-0000000000._msdcs.mydomain.org.uk,target_principal=GC/newdc.mydomain.org.uk/mydomain.org.uk,abstract_syntax=11111111-2222-3333-4444-5555555555/0x00000004,localaddress=192.168.1.3] > NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARA...

...up+0x26/0x100 (XEN) [<ff117e80>] stopmachine_softirq+0x0/0xa0 (XEN) [<ff1f69d5>] __start_xen+0xef5/0x1570 (XEN) [<ff1e6250>] e820nr+0x0/0x4 (XEN) [<ff10006c>] __high_start+0x58/0x5a (XEN) (XEN) Pagetable walk from fff7aff8: (XEN) L3[0x003] = 000000000022f001 55555555 (XEN) L2[0x1ff] = 0000000000271063 55555555 (XEN) L1[0x17a] = 0000000000000000 ffffffff (XEN) (XEN) **************************************** (XEN) Panic on CPU 0: (XEN) FATAL PAGE FAULT (XEN) [error_code=0000] (XEN) Faulting linear address: fff7aff8 (XEN) ***************************************...

...r "-" (dashes), so right now I'm only using characters from the set [a-z0-9-] in context names. >> >[voiptalk.org] >> >;forwards any calls starting with an "8" thru voiptalk.org >> >exten => _8.,1,Answer >> >exten => _8.,3,SetCIDNum(55555555) >> >exten => _8.,4,SetCIDName(My Name And Surname) >> >exten => _8.,5,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:1}@voiptalk.org,,g) >> >exten => _8.,6,HangUp >> >[invalid_calls] ;;; default context for invalid calls >> >exten => _.,1,Wait(1) >> >ext...

...NETDEV_CHANGE): vif25.0: link becomes ready Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: xenbr0: topology change detected, propagating Dec 20 13:18:12 kr kernel: xenbr0: port 5(vif25.0) entering forwarding state xm dmesg reports nothing unusual except these at the end: (XEN) mm.c:649:d22 Error getting mfn 3b6 (pfn 55555555) from L1 entry 00000000003b6025 for dom22 (XEN) mm.c:3341:d22 ptwr_emulate: fixing up invalid PAE PTE 00000000003b6025 But I've no idea when those messages have been created. I've disabled selinux in dom0. Other domUs are running fine, although I haven't tried rebooting them. Any id...

...: 00000000 [ 18.824613] r7 : bf26ac80 r6 : 00000000 r5 : ed155650 r4 : fffffffc [ 18.824616] r3 : 0002f000 r2 : ffffffff r1 : 2df30000 r0 : ed155400 [ 18.824621] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user [ 18.824624] Control: 30c5387d Table: aeb18840 DAC: 55555555 [ 18.824628] Process systemd-udevd (pid: 245, stack limit = 0xc66954c3) [ 18.824633] Stack: (0xed5dfc70 to 0xed5e0000) [ 18.824636] fc60: ed155400 ed155400 00000000 c068e45c [ 18.824641] fc80: ed155400 00000000 00000000 c06751a4 00000001 00000001 ffff...

Hi All, I am not very familiar with xen details. Now I am thinking of building two privilged domain(domain 0 not driver domain) at boot time. The other question is that wether it is possible to create another domain 0 by domain-builder running in domain0? Does it make sense when domain 0 is shut down unexpectedly another domain 0 can run at once. Maybe it is absurd. I am looking forwards

...18.824613] r7 : bf26ac80 r6 : 00000000 r5 : ed155650 r4 : fffffffc > [ 18.824616] r3 : 0002f000 r2 : ffffffff r1 : 2df30000 r0 : ed155400 > [ 18.824621] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user > [ 18.824624] Control: 30c5387d Table: aeb18840 DAC: 55555555 > [ 18.824628] Process systemd-udevd (pid: 245, stack limit = 0xc66954c3) > [ 18.824633] Stack: (0xed5dfc70 to 0xed5e0000) > [ 18.824636] fc60: ed155400 ed155400 00000000 c068e45c > [ 18.824641] fc80: ed155400 00000000 00000000 c06751a4 00...

We (Michael Fetterman, George Dunlap and I) have been working over the last while on a full replacement for Xen''s shadow pagetable support. This mail contains some design notes, below; a patch against xen-unstable, giving a snapshot of the current state of the new shadow code, is at http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tjd21/shadow2.patch Comments on both are welcome, although the code is not