Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "55450".
Did you mean:
e5450
[Bug 55450] New: nouveau driver fails to restore screen content / video mode after resume from s2ram
2012 Sep 29
16
[Bug 55450] New: nouveau driver fails to restore screen content / video mode after resume from s2ram
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55450
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 55450
Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: nouveau driver fails to restore screen content / video
mode after resume from s2ram
QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org
Severity: nor...
2006 Oct 16
1
Printing
I have applied Sean''s patches internally. Only print preview is
working. I will try to see why page setup and print aren''t working later.
Be careful applying those patches as they may remove the TaskBarIcon
changes that were checked in recently. (I just edited them out before
applying)
Roy
2009 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] Integer casting warning, and another set of warnings
...switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case'
labels
R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk_VC8_building\lib\Target\X86\X86GenDAGISel.inc(55442)
: warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case'
labels
R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk_VC8_building\lib\Target\X86\X86GenDAGISel.inc(55450)
: warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case'
labels
2009 May 12
0
[LLVMdev] Integer casting warning, and another set of warnings
...switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case'
labels
R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk_VC8_building\lib\Target\X86\X86GenDAGISel.inc(55442)
: warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case'
labels
R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk_VC8_building\lib\Target\X86\X86GenDAGISel.inc(55450)
: warning C4065: switch statement contains 'default' but no 'case'
labels
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...234977 9 0.02 229289 7 0.02 229195
BenchmarkDemo.ll 221 4989042 49 0.74 4980861 24 0.75 4982243
benchmark.ll 2 12300 0 0.01 12275 0 0.01 12275
bf_cbc.ll 1 48342 0 0.01 48307 0 0.01 48307
bf_cfb64.ll 1 21004 0 0.01 20969 0 0.01 20969
bf_ecb.ll 2 9148 0 0.01 9113 0 0.01 9113
bf_enc.ll 1 55485 0 0.01 55450 0 0.01 55450
bf_ofb64.ll 1 17572 0 0.01 17537 0 0.01 17537
bf_skey.ll 1 27891 0 0.01 27856 0 0.01 27856
bftest.ll 3 66992 0 0.01 66957 0 0.01 66957
biaridecod.ll 12 46041 0 0.01 46020 0 0.01 46020
biariencode.ll 14 114832 0 0.02 114811 0 0.02 114811
bicg.ll 12 26496 0 0.01 26448 0 0.00 26448
bigfib...