Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "553e7470".
2011 Dec 27
3
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
Hi,
It looks like the default for -fomit-frame-pointer has recently changed
from "no" to "yes at O1 and higher", but I did not see the commit.
Was that intentional?
(AddressSanitizer uses frame pointers to unwind stack, that's how we
noticed).
Thanks,
--kcc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2011 Dec 27
0
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like the default for -fomit-frame-pointer has recently changed from
> "no" to "yes at O1 and higher", but I did not see the commit.
> Was that intentional?
Yes; r146586.
-Eli
2011 Dec 27
4
[LLVMdev] -f[no-]omit-frame-pointer
...e-fp-elim when asan is enabled or document that asan
requires -fomit-frame-pointer for better warning messages?
Thanks!
--kcc
>
> -Eli
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111227/553e7470/attachment.html>