Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "55129aab".
2008 May 16
0
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
...op 24 bits were sign/zero extended. I think we can handle this by
adding some new attributes, but this is marginally ugly.
What do you think?
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080516/55129aab/attachment.html>
2008 May 14
7
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ...
In this thread I'm trying to merge two email threads into one, because
both discuss the same problem that's troubling us and I would like to
reach a conclusion on what would be the best approach.
To minimize the size of this thread I only mention the subject of the
other two threads:
(1) [LLVMdev] Integer promotion of return node operand
(initiated by Sachin)
(2) [LLVMdev] trouble