Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "54fa9ff1".
2004 Aug 14
1
[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized? ..
...the general case.
>
> -Chris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040814/54fa9ff1/attachment.sig>
2004 Aug 14
0
[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized? ..
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Valery A.Khamenya wrote:
> > > ExecutionEngine* EE = ExecutionEngine::create( MP, true );
> > As Reid pointed out, changing true to false will get it to work.
>
> as I've posted already, I got Segmentation Fault.
> Now, i have re-compiled LLVM with debug support.
>
> The evaluation is broken at line 78 in file:
>
2004 Aug 14
2
[LLVMdev] is this code really JITed and/or optimized? ..
> > ExecutionEngine* EE = ExecutionEngine::create( MP, true );
>
> As Reid pointed out, changing true to false will get it to work.
as I've posted already, I got Segmentation Fault.
Now, i have re-compiled LLVM with debug support.
The evaluation is broken at line 78 in file:
lib/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JIT.cpp
The assertion
assert(ArgValues.size() == 1);
fails. But